Say you were clinically fed up
A disciplinary procedure is directed against the worker's behavior rather than the person.
The most serious disciplinary action to be charge against a Member of Congress is expulsion. The process of expulsion in the House of Representative and from the Senate is different.
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
Yes. A husband/father does not need his wife's permission to take their child. If he leaves permanently she has recourse but not for a short term absence after a marital argument.
Yes it is against the law, because by running someone's credit without permission is committing Fraud.
There was no action taken for the hit.
He had a hearing because he used Expecto Patronum Against two dementors in front of Dudley.
Ching Chuan Gan has written: 'Disciplinary proceedings against public officers in Malaysia'
yes the employee can take action
The Human Resource Office in your workplace would have a document that out lines disciplinary actions for work place situations. To understand what actions would be taken against an employee one need only read the document.
It usually means you're sent home without pay - pending a decision on what disciplinary action will be taken against you.
Let's assume that your asking about disciplinary actions against a specific employee. (Supervisorys can always discuss general policy, such as "don't be late.") Most human resources managers would agree that it is not wise for a supervisor to discuss specific disciplinary actions taken against an employee publicly. However, it does happen. Some companies have the policy to keep all disciplinary issues private. If that is the case, the supervisor could actually be written up for it. In other companies, disciplinary matters might be discussed. For example, if John steals from his coworker Mary, the company may want Mary to know that John has been disciplined.