Development is learning and going through difficult trials where you learn through trial and error. The above statement is invalid because development can be explained in simple terms.
Interviews are one to one so any questions can be explained or areas of interest explored theoretically making the data more validRespondents can still not tell the truth for some reason which would put the validity in question
Incremental validity is the gain in validity resulting from adding new predictors to an existing selection system (Sackett, P. R. & Lievens, F. 2008. Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419-450). http://psych.annualreviews.orgIncremental Validity. This form of validity can help determine whether or not a particular instrument or method provides a significant improvement in addition to the use of another approach. For instance, does a screening instrument provide a significantly better result during an 50 minute interview than just using just the interview alone? An particular approach is said to have incremental validity if it actually helps more that not using it.http://www.incrisis.org/Articles/ReliabilityValidityUseful.htm
Validity is harder to prove because data can be valid within a specific range. Data that is reliable can be proved by using the information successfully.
Patients are asked to test the validity of the automatic thoughts and schemas they encounter. The therapist may ask the patient to defend or produce evidence that a schema is true.
Norms reliability validity
A validity statement refers to a statement that indicates the accuracy and authenticity of a research study's findings, conclusions, or results. It helps to demonstrate that the study measured what it intended to measure and that the results are reliable and trustworthy.
Dave Letterman says 50 billion ...prompting me to check the validity of the statement.
The term validity is the action of validating something. When something is valid, it is real, legitimate, or a true true statement about a topic or subject.
In general terms, "validity" denotes "something acceptable within context". Thus, in an ordinary, everyday context, an example of "validity" would be a statement made which turns out to be true. Here, one would say that the statement made has "validity". By contrast, in a legal context, a statement made by a witness in a court case might be considered to lack "validity" because of certain legal strictures that prevent the witness' perspective from being considered by a jury. Many other examples could be provided, given the many different applications of "validity" that are possible.
Argument
Well from my knowledge you used the term validity wrong, validity is a characteristic of arguments, you meant to say truth which is a characteristic of statements.
claim
claim
Claim
Argument
Dave Letterman says 50 billion ...prompting me to check the validity of the statement.
Which statement about the Rorschach Inkblot Test is false?