The existence of galactic clusters is consistent with the Big Bang although it would be equally consistent with the alternative Steady State theory.
For sure - galactic clusters. Expansion of the universe is demonstrated via the redshift of galactic clusters (outside of the local galactic cluster which hosts the Milky Way galaxy). Pulsars may also provide some insight into expansion via the emission of their light signatures, but it is not generally considered a specific support (in and of itself).
No
Hubble constant (galactic red shifts)3K microwave background radiationlight element/isotope ratios (i.e. hydrogen, deuterium, helium, lithium)
A spectroscope is an instrument that can be used to observe the frequency (or wavelength) of characteristic spectral lines to see how far the lines were shifted (red shift or blue shift) from their usual position. All galaxies outside our local galactic cluster produce light that is red-shifted; and the greater the distance between us and these outside galaxies, the greater the red shift. That the size of the red shift depends on the distance is considered isotropic (or the same in all directions), meaning the distance between our local galactic cluster and all other galactic clusters is increasing at the same ratio based on distance from us. These distant galactic clusters, demonstrating red shift, are supportive evidence that these outside galaxies are moving further apart consistent with the Big Bang Theory. Note: The core ideas of the Big Bang is that the Universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with an incredibly high energy density and huge temperatures and pressures and was very rapidly expanding and cooling.
I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.
For sure - galactic clusters. Expansion of the universe is demonstrated via the redshift of galactic clusters (outside of the local galactic cluster which hosts the Milky Way galaxy). Pulsars may also provide some insight into expansion via the emission of their light signatures, but it is not generally considered a specific support (in and of itself).
No
Hubble constant (galactic red shifts)3K microwave background radiationlight element/isotope ratios (i.e. hydrogen, deuterium, helium, lithium)
A spectroscope is an instrument that can be used to observe the frequency (or wavelength) of characteristic spectral lines to see how far the lines were shifted (red shift or blue shift) from their usual position. All galaxies outside our local galactic cluster produce light that is red-shifted; and the greater the distance between us and these outside galaxies, the greater the red shift. That the size of the red shift depends on the distance is considered isotropic (or the same in all directions), meaning the distance between our local galactic cluster and all other galactic clusters is increasing at the same ratio based on distance from us. These distant galactic clusters, demonstrating red shift, are supportive evidence that these outside galaxies are moving further apart consistent with the Big Bang Theory. Note: The core ideas of the Big Bang is that the Universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with an incredibly high energy density and huge temperatures and pressures and was very rapidly expanding and cooling.
I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.
The Theory of Relativity was created by Einstein, not by Eisenstein. Comment: The most obvious thing is that Einstein's equations predicted that the Universe was not "static". So a "Big Bang", expanding Universe fits the theory.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Cos it is an amazing tv show
Discard it all.
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
it seems to support the big bang theory, but the Bible says that God stretches out the heavens and this discovery supports that
Note that it also helped support the theory of inflation. The reason is that the observed radiation very closely matched what was expected from the theory.