In World War 2, no, not necessarily better in terms of quality and performance, but US guns were simpler, and US industry could produce more of them. German factories worked by slave labor had trouble supplying the German Army with enough guns. In comparing the US M1 Garand rifle with the German Gewher 43, the G43 was actually a superior weapon, but the Germans managed to produce them only by the thousand while the US made over a million M1 rifles.
In World War 1, both armies were equipped with guns which were roughly equal to each other, with a few exceptions. For example, the US M1911 pistol was much more rugged for trench warfare than the delicate German P-08. Yet, the Germans had much better machine guns than the horrible French Chauchat which US machine gunners were required to use. US Marines did a bit better, equipped with the British Lewis machine gun which was not perfect but much better than the French machine gun.
The new weapons changed the way soldiers fought in WW1 because they were much better. They had tanks and many new guns which were better than before.
Yes, machine guns are better than Gatling guns because they fire more bullets faster than Gatling guns. Gatling guns need to have bullets and have to be hand cranked at the same time but machine guns does not need to be hand cranked. Machine guns only need bullets.
Answer this question…The Soviet army had more soldiers than the German army, and German soldiers were not prepared for the harsh Russian winter.
The Cuban soldiers mainly uses machetes and what ever gun they could find.The guns they used were guns from killed enemy's think it is amazing that the Spain soldiers were trained better, and had better weapons than Cubans but they still put up a good fight.But the main weapon was the machetes and one tactic that they used was the machete charge.
Nothing is better.
yes they are. machine guns are fed bullets. Gatling guns are hand cranked and have to be fed bullets at the same time. machine guns also spray bullets faster than Gatling guns.
Both are better
thay are German trooprs from world war l and world ll thay are also call shock troopsor fireteams. they are like assault soldiers they use flamethrower platoon than old infantry guns i also think they were apart NAZI PARTY ? or somethine.
Answer this question…The Soviet army had more soldiers than the German army, and German soldiers were not prepared for the harsh Russian winter.
They are, unless the legos are made out of gold, than no.
German dugouts were often deeper and reinforced with concrete and steel, making them more resistant to artillery fire. They also had better ventilation systems and living conditions compared to French and British dugouts, which were more basic in design and construction. Additionally, German dugouts were strategically located with better defensive positions and camouflage, providing better protection for their soldiers.
yes