In a direct democracy, all voters get to vote on all issues. In an indirect democracy, voters vote for people to represent them, and the representatives are the ones who then vote on the various issues that governments deal with.
Direct democracy is a system where citizens make decisions directly on issues, often through voting or participation in meetings. Indirect democracy, also known as representative democracy, involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
A direct democracy is when every single person gets to decide on an issue (i.e. bills, laws, etc.), While an indirect democracy is where people elect representatives to decide on issues for them (i.e. United States).
The difference between direct and indirect democracy is that in direct democracy it would be almost like the people take a poll to decide things. Usually in a direct democracy there arent many people in the country. But in an indirect democracypeople vote for someone to represent them and help make the final decision on things. Like how Obama is the president, we elected him to represent us... hope this helped
Direct democracy the citizens vote for what they want, in indirect democracy the representive is voted for and makes the decisions
direct democracy is better one . look at America
the differences are if you smoke herb then you smoke herb but if you smoke weed then you kill trees.
Direct and Indirect
The three forms of democracy are direct democracy, representative democracy, and parliamentary democracy. In direct democracy, citizens directly participate in decision-making. In representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. In parliamentary democracy, the executive branch is accountable to the legislature.
No, the United States does not have a pure democracy. It is a democratic republic where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This system allows for a balance between direct democracy and representative democracy.
Advantages of indirect democracy include representation of diverse perspectives and the ability of elected officials to make informed decisions on behalf of the population. Disadvantages can include potential for corruption, lack of direct citizen participation in decision-making, and the risk of elected officials prioritizing their own interests over those of the people they serve.
indirect democracy
A direct democracy
Direct and Indirect
direct democracy is when each person rules and indirect is when people vote for people who rule.
heather was here!
Direct Democracy: People represent themselves. Indirect Democracy: People elect representatives to represent them. :)
There are no officials in a direct democracy, in a direct democracy all citizens vote on all the issues, unlike a representative or an indirect democracy (which is what the united states is). In a indirect democracy citizens of voting age who are registered to vote elect officials.
No, a direct democracy could always be possible, though largely impracticable in larger states.
Indirect democracy!
Direct democracy is bad because indirect democracy is good. BB Netinyahu x
they both do stuff
Presidential and Parliamentary. Presidential which is direct democracy and Parliamentary (like UK) which is indirect democracy.
direct and indirect democracy