Yes, babies absolutely have gills, it is how an unborn baby breathes while inside of the womb. Research suggests that when a baby is berthed in a bath, a pool, a lake, an ocean, or any other type of water environment, the gills take action and allow the baby to breathe in air, even when surrounded by water (Mculoch et al. 2010). The Sea Gypsies are a prime example of this, these people have developed their gills their entire lives, and could basically live under water if they really wanted to.
Babys are called larva and have gills, most adults do not have gills.
of coarse tadpoles have gills because through there first weeks of life they live in the water. but they will slowly lose there gills and live on land.
If it has gills and it can swim.
No, they don't. Baby frogs (tadpoles) do but they grow lungs when they become frogs.
no, because then those gills gills would need gills and they would need gills and so on, so on. They have specialised cells instead.
gills.
Lobsters have gills.
gills are structures in fish for breathing in water while gills chambers are the cavities in which gills are enclosed
Baby clams look like small, pale larvae. They do not have shells, gills, etc. until they mature, and they do not develop a foot until they are around 24 days old.
If your baby starts to develop gills at 4 months gestation then you can assume your baby is going to be a deep sea diver. If you see fins before 4 months or before gills in general I advise brutal abortion of the baby. A hard kick to the stomach will kill anything in there. funny, but i take good care of my freshwater fish and tank that i really wanted a serious answer to my question. I thought this was the place for that. sorry
Yes they have gills, but during their transformation into a frog they gain lungs and then lose their gills.
Fish can not be amphibians. The big difference is that amphibians breath by gills or spiracles when they are young and develop lungs as they grow and undergo metamorphosis, while fish can only breath via gills.