answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A democracy does, because if people want to have a voice in the government and they want to choose who will be their ruler, they will want to move to that empire and therefore, the empire will grow and grow until it has reached its highest point or they are destroyed during war/a battle.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does a republic or a democracy seem to be more workable for a growing empire?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Does a republic or democracy seem to be more workable for a growing or expanding empire?

A republic may be more workable for a growing or expanding empire as it can provide a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power and ensure stability. Democracies, on the other hand, may face challenges in decision-making and governance with a large and diverse population in an expanding empire.


Who was first the roman republic the roman empire or the athenian democracy and in what order?

Athenian democracy, Roman Republic, Roman Empire


How were the political systems of the Roman empire and the Roman republic different?

the Empire was virtually a Dictatorship and the republic was a democracy


Who is Israel's empire?

Israel doesn't have an empire. It is a parliamentary Republic with representational democracy.


What type of democracy did the Roman Empire have?

The Roman Empire was not a democracy, there were no votes and no voted elected officials. It was however designed as a Republic which had appointed representation, Senators.


what city state had the first democracy?

No empire established democracy. The first instance of democracy was in the city-state of ancient Athens, which was a republic. Since democracy means rule by the people, the terms democracy and empire are a dichotomy.


How long was Rome a democracy before coming empire?

Rome was never a democracy. Rome was a Republic from 510 to 27 BC. That was 483 years.


What is the the difference between Republic and pax romana?

The Republic was a type of democracy (before the empire) and not very successful. The Pax Roman was a time of peace for the Roman empire because of good trade.


A sentence using the word republic?

The empire knew that the republic's army was growing bigger by the minute. (May the force be with you) -Fillywilly


What was one major change that occurred in Rome after its transition from a republic to an empire?

These are two different terms. A republic is a system of government; an empire is a group of countries under one control. Rome was an empire long before it had an emperor - the republic ruled an empire covering half of Europe.from Spain to Greece. The republic was a limited democracy ruled by the Senate, The next phase did away with the limited democracy and for 200 years became a power-sharing arrangement between emperor and senate.


What is a repulic?

A representative Democracy, /The USA started out as a Republic and so did Ancient Rome. However it seems that from both of those examples a Republic always becomes an Empire.


Is democracy the only type of government north America has?

Im not sure, United States of America is not technically a democracy though, because it is a republic, like the Roman Empire was.