It does not always support with republicanism. In a judiciary the president appoints the judges the people don't on the contrary republicanism is were the people elect representatives and vote them in congress. Now when the judicial branch wants to pass laws it would always have controversy with the representatives because they might have different ideas than the judicial court that would serve the common good of the people (representatives job). To conclude, the independent Judiciary some times will conflict with representatives.
Yes, an independent judiciary supports republicanism by ensuring the separation of powers and providing a check on the other branches of government. It helps maintain the rule of law and protects individual rights and liberties. An independent judiciary helps prevent the concentration of power and promotes democratic governance in a republican system.
In the US, the independent judiciary is necessary.
Yes, India have a independent judiciary.
The independent of judiciary is the concept that the judiciary needs to be kept away from the other branches of government. It is vital and independent to the idea of separation of powers.
It was important because it support the constitution
It was important because it support the constitution
It has an independent judiciary.
yes as india's salient feature is to be independent
Independent judiciary was a fledgling idea in Medieval Europe. ?æWith the establishment of Habeas Corpus and the Magna Carta, the foundation was established for courts to be a separate entity.
YES , division of powers and independent judiciary the two important features of federal form of government
both have an independent judiciary
yes
It has a bicameral Legislature, an Independent Judiciary and a strong Executive.