a department employs many employees
designing and implementing an online voting system
ProxyDemocracy.org has the most comprehensive list so far. You can go to their site and look up a company and see how several funds are voting. Since several of the funds are large, you can find out how at least a few funds are voting about 2 weeks before most corporate meetings. If you subscribe (free), they will send you e-mails whenever they learn how a fund is voting. As of the summer of 2009 they collected the intended votes of ten institutional investors that are particularly engaged in corporate governance:AFSCME Employees Pension Plan, which manages the retirement funds of AFSCME employees (voting profile) (website )CalPERS, which manages the pensions of about 1.5 million California public employees (voting profile) (website )CalSTRS, which manages the pension funds of public school teachers in California (voting profile) (website )Calvert, which offers socially responsible mutual funds (voting profile) (website )CBIS, which manages the assets of over 1,000 Catholic institutions worldwide (voting profile) (website )Domini, which offers socially responsible mutual funds (voting profile) (website )Florida SBA, which manages retirement funds on behalf of Florida public employees (voting profile) (website )Green Century, which offers environmentally responsible mutual funds (voting profile) (website )MMA Praxis, which integrates faith and finance for individual and institutional clients (voting profile) (website )Trillium Asset Management, which offers socially responsible asset management to individual and institutional clients (voting profile) (website )Another source is TransparentDemocracy.org. They cover far fewer issuers but they also cover civic elections as well.MoxyVote.com is the newest entry. As I write this, they are still in the testing phase. One feature they have that's great is the ability to vote your shares through their site and to rank voting advisors so that you can always vote with x but if no votes are recorded for x, the system will default to y. If no votes are registered for y, it will default to z, etc. for 5 choices.With as few as 6% of retail shareowners voting under "e-proxy," building and utilizing these sites becomes critical. Who has time to research all the proxy issues? These sites make it easy to vote along with trusted "brands."
Only Oregon has tried Internet voting.
No. In 1997 Microsoft owned $100 Million of non voting shares, that thet could not sell for 2 years. They have since sold them.
These days we no longer vote with paper ballots. We vote on "Voting machines" that tally the votes and send the information to the electoral college.
i want use case diagram for online voting system
You can prepare data flow diagram for online voting system. You can do that make graphs, maps and bar graphs showing the amount of data flow that is growing.
An example of an online voting system is the website eballot, where users are allowed to create an account and cast their votes from their computers at home.
solution is none other than online polling system..Let us praise and pray that the project would be bring a great change with success.
digital disasters and violations of security
designing and implementing an online voting system
in which possess does voting right system fall?
1) Electronic voting system 2)Emergency service training 3)Browser utility 4)ATM Track system 5)Bike Sales System
1- people can hack into the system 2-information can be lost 3-computers break down
The papal conclave system of voting is not based on anything Masonic. It has been in existence long before the Masons were founded.
Citizens think about political issues critically ---> Citizens make informed voting decisions.
NO