answersLogoWhite

0

Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade was a United States Supreme Court case. The outcome of the case gave legal definitions to things such a viability of a fetus, and set many regulations involving abortion.

500 Questions

Which courts did the Roe v Wade case go through?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Roe v Wade case went through several courts before reaching the Supreme Court. It was initially heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, then the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and finally the Supreme Court of the United States.

What was the court of original jurisdiction for Roe v. Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The court of original jurisdiction for Roe v. Wade was the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

How many conservative judges voted for roe v wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

None. The landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in the United States, was decided in 1973. At that time, the Supreme Court had a majority of justices appointed by Republican presidents, who generally aligned with conservative ideology on social issues. However, the Court's decision in Roe v. Wade was upheld by a majority of justices who were appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents.

Thirty-five years after Roe v Wade many Catholics wonder why the country still does not protect the life of every unborn person The case against abortion seems compelling so why does it often fail?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The issue of abortion is complex and multifaceted. While some people argue against abortion on moral grounds and believe in the sanctity of life, others prioritize a woman's right to make decisions about her own body. Additionally, there are various legal and political factors at play, including differing interpretations of constitutional rights and the ongoing debate about when exactly life begins. Ultimately, the failure to protect the life of every unborn person may be rooted in these differing perspectives and the inability to reach a consensus on this deeply divisive issue.

What is the subject of Roe V. wade and what was the supreme court's decision?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The subject of Roe v. Wade was the constitutionality of a Texas law that criminalized abortion except to save a woman's life. The Supreme Court's decision in 1973 held that a woman has a constitutional right to have an abortion under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but acknowledged that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against the state's interest in protecting the potential life of the fetus.

Who did not support the decision in Roe v Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Many conservative politicians, religious groups, and pro-life activists did not support the decision in Roe v. Wade. They argue that it infringes upon the rights of unborn children and believe that the issue of abortion should be left to the states to decide. Additionally, some believe that the decision goes against their religious beliefs and the sanctity of life.

What would a Republican President change in Roe v Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

A Republican President may aim to change or overturn Roe v. Wade, which is the landmark Supreme Court decision that established a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. This change could potentially lead to more restrictions on access to abortion, such as increasing regulations on clinics or implementing waiting periods for women seeking abortions. However, the extent of the changes would depend on the specific approach and goals of the President.

What will it take to overule roe vs wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

To overrule Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court would need to take up a case that directly challenges the decision and issue a new ruling that reverses the previous decision. This would likely require a conservative majority on the Court, as the decision was made by a 7-2 majority in 1973. Additionally, there would need to be a case that presents new legal arguments or factual circumstances that convince the Court to change its interpretation of the constitutional right to abortion.

What did Roe v Wade block states from doing?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Roe v. Wade blocked states from banning abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. The landmark Supreme Court case established that a woman has a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, and any state laws that imposed an undue burden on that right were deemed unconstitutional.

What rights did Roe vs Wade establish?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Roe v. Wade, a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1973, established a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. The case determined that a state law banning abortions, except to save the life of the mother, was unconstitutional, as it violated a woman's privacy rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision held that a woman is entitled to have an abortion in the early stages of pregnancy without undue government interference.

Explain what situations might exist today if the Roe v Wade case had not gone to the US Supreme Court?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

If the Roe v Wade case had not gone to the US Supreme Court, each state would have the power to regulate and restrict abortion according to their own laws. This could result in a patchwork of varying restrictions and accessibility across the country, leading to disparities in women's access to safe and legal abortions. It could also potentially undermine the constitutional right to privacy and reproductive freedom established by Roe v Wade.

Which issue was addressed in the Supreme Court Decision Roe v Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade addressed the issue of abortion and established the constitutional right to privacy, which includes a woman's right to have an abortion. This landmark decision legalized abortion nationwide and prohibited states from banning or significantly restricting access to abortion.

Who pressed charges in the Roe v Wade court case?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

No one pressed charges in the Roe v. Wade court case. It was a landmark case that originated in Texas, where "Jane Roe" (a pseudonym for Norma McCorvey) filed a lawsuit challenging the state's abortion laws. The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, who was responsible for enforcing those laws.

Constitutional issue faced in roe v wade case?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The main constitutional issue in Roe v. Wade was whether a woman's right to have an abortion is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment's right to privacy. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that a constitutional right to privacy does exist, and that it encompasses a woman's decision to have an abortion. However, the Court also acknowledged that states have an interest in protecting the potential life of the fetus, and therefore, state regulations on abortion are permissible as long as they do not place an undue burden on the woman.

Is Roe v Wade a case were wrongful due process was used?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

It is generally not considered to be a case where wrongful due process was used. Roe v. Wade was a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1973 that established a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. The court ruled that a Texas law criminalizing abortion violated a woman's right to privacy, which is within the scope of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. While the decision has been controversial, it is generally seen as an example of the court properly interpreting and applying due process rights.

Who is the defendant in roe v wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The plaintiff in Roe v. Wade, (1973) was identified as "Jane Roe," a common proxy for the name of someone who wishes to remain anonymous. The real plaintiff in the case was Norma McCorvey.

McCorvey never had an abortion. She gave birth to a baby girl who was immediately placed for adoption. McCorvey renounced her pro-choice stance in recent years and has become a Right to Life activist.

In the US Supreme Court case Roe v Wade was Roe pregnant?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, "Roe" in the case Roe v. Wade was pregnant at the time the case was brought before the court. Her real name was Norma McCorvey, and she was seeking an abortion but was unable to under Texas law. The case ultimately established a constitutional right to abortion.

What are opinions about whether Roe v. Wade should be overturned?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Opinions on whether Roe v. Wade should be overturned vary greatly. Proponents of overturning argue for the protection of fetal life and the belief that the decision should be left to individual states. Those against overturning argue for the right to access safe and legal abortion, viewing it as a matter of reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. Ultimately, this is a highly contentious and complex issue with deeply held beliefs on both sides.

Who was affected by Roe v Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision in 1973, affected pregnant women in the United States. The ruling established a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion, thereby ensuring increased access and legal protection for reproductive choices. It also impacted healthcare providers who could now offer safe and legal abortions, as well as activists and organizations pushing for women's reproductive rights.

What did Henry Wade want in the case?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Henry Wade, as the District Attorney of Dallas County, wanted to secure a conviction of Jack Ruby for the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald. Wade sought justice for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and believed that Ruby's actions in killing Oswald were premeditated and carried out with the intent to deprive Oswald of his constitutional rights.

Why did the dissent disagree in Roe v Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The dissent in Roe v. Wade disagreed with the majority's decision to recognize a constitutional right to abortion. They argued that the Constitution does not explicitly address the issue of abortion, and that the matter should be left to the states to decide through democratic processes. They also believed that the potential life of the fetus should be given more weight and protection by the state.

Who are the roe v wade lawyers?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973) had to be argued twice because both attorneys failed to make a strong case to the Court in the initial oral stage. Roe's attorney, Sarah Weddington, was unable to explain to Justice Potter Stewart why the Constitution would protect a woman's right to privacy. The attorney representing Texas, Jay Floyd, also had a weak argument.

Robert C. Flowers replaced Floyd as Jane Roe's Texas' lead counsel and withstood strenuous questioning from both Justice Stewart and Justice Marshall.

To access MP3 recordings of the oral arguments in Roe v. Wade, see Related Links, below.

Why did some people protest the ruling in Roe v Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Some people protested the ruling in Roe v. Wade because they believe that abortion is morally wrong and that it violates the rights of unborn children. They also argue that the decision should be left to individual states to decide rather than being determined by the federal government.

What political party was in office during Roe v. Wade?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Roe v. Wade case was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1973. At that time, the Republican Party held the presidency, with Richard Nixon in office. However, the case was not decided along party lines, as the Court's ruling was a 7-2 decision.

Why is roe v wade so controversial?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Direct Answer

This controversial ruling struck down many of the legal restrictions that were (at that time) in place against abortion. It is hard to estimate the impact of the ruling itself, since it was tied in with a number of much broader movements: the sexual revolution, women's rights movement, feminism, and civil rights more generally. However, for a period of perhaps 100 years prior - beginning in the late 19th century and ending with RvW - abortion was a felony in most states in the US, punishable by fine or imprisonment. This meant that women who became pregnant were legally obligated to bring the child to term regardless of the conditions of their life or how they came to be pregnant. The only exceptions were for imminent risk to the woman's life. Abortions were still carried out despite the legal restrictions, but (because of the risks to those doing the abortions, who could also be jailed), abortions were often done secretively and without proper medical procedures. This carried an unfortunately high rate of medical problems, either from the treatment itself or from post-treatment infection, which could sometimes lead to permanent reproductive damage or even death.

Some have connected abortion with increases in sexual promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, and other social ills, though this is probably a function of the sexual revolution more generally, which legitimized non-marital sexuality and created an open environment for discussions and depictions of sexuality in media (such as advertising and entertainment). Frankly, the risk of pregnancy (despite what people may say) has never been much of a deterrent to sexual activity in people of any age. The debate over abortion has become a significant cultural phenomenon in its own right, with an impact on election campaigns and public policy nationwide, though it has generally focused on the question of rights (the rights of the mother against the rights of an unborn child) rather than on questions of sexuality.


Moral considerations

The right to an abortion was seen as one of the lynch-pins of the women's rights movement not because abortion was needed as a form of contraception - there were many contraceptives available at the time, as there are today - but because abortion was seen as a necessary 'last-ditch' safeguard against a woman being forced to have a child against her will. Contraceptives might fail or be sabotaged, sexual intercourse might be forced, living conditions might make raising a child an untenable burden; all of these cases can result in a woman being reduced (to use the feminist's terminology) to a form of chattel slavery, in which she must dedicate her life to caring for a child she neither asked for nor wanted. The moral/ethical conflict, thus, lies between the inherent right any individual has to be free (which is well-established in moral and legal codes) and the right of an unborn individual to live (highly contentious uncharted territory, since the various religious and medical opinions can not agree at what point an unborn child becomes a living being). The most conservative opinions hold that a child becomes a living being at conception (which would make any abortion a form of murder); more common opinions believe fetuses become living beings when they begin to move (usually at the end of the first trimester, which is what current law and practice use); some religious beliefs go so far as to hold that a child is not a living being until it draws its first breath (which is the standard that most US courts use to distinguish between the crime of late-term abortion and the much more serious crime of infanticide, in cases where newborns are found dead).