The plessy vs Ferguson case upheld the constitutionality of state laws, like the Jim crow laws, that allowed racial segregation in private business under the doctrine "separate but equal." so basically, it proved that the Jim crow laws were allowed under the constitution.
I have to answer this question for a social studies final: What were the "Jim Crow" laws and what term did the court address and establish as policy for years, starting in 1954 with Plessey vs. Ferguson? I have to have at least to sentences for the answer. And I'm allowed to use the internet. I have "They were state and local laws in the U.S. enacted between 1876 and 1965." That's all I have if anyone can help I would really appreciate it.
Never mind I found the answer. It was "Seperate, but equal"
Plessy vs Ferguson was the court case that supported Jim Crow laws stating that "seperate but equal" was constitutional.
: : : ; : :
separate rail facilities
the decision of plessy vs. ferguson
: : : ; : :
Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the south's practice of 'separate but equal' policies, a/k/a 'Jim Crow Laws'.
The main people involved in Plessy v. Ferguson were Homer Plessy, who was the plaintiff in the case and a man of mixed racial heritage, and Judge John H. Ferguson, who was the defendant in his capacity as a judge responsible for enforcing segregation laws in Louisiana. The lawyers who represented the parties before the Supreme Court were Albion Tourgée for Plessy and Milton J. Cunningham for Ferguson.
== == Plessy v. Ferguson == ==
No, just the opposite. Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) validated the practice of segregation and provided a foundation for the expansion of racist Jim Crow laws. Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) overturned Plessy, holding that "separate but equal" is unconstitutional.
State laws requiring racial segregation were upheld by the Court.
State laws requiring racial segregation were upheld by the Court.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 was a landmark constitutional law case of the US Supreme Court. It upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but equal".