It was only rarely an issue. Only the country's rich and powerful had any direct dealings with the king at all. In the minds of common people before the 19th century, the elevated position of the King was simply a given and not a subject of any discussion amongst them. To those the monarch was a distant figure, and common people only had to deal with the power of local lords and magistrates.
Revolts against a king were very rare and if they happened at all, they were mostly instigated by nobles, not by the common citizens. The revolt of the Dutch against the King of Spain is one of the very rare cases before the end of the 19th century where 'common people' revolted against the power of a king.
The people that the monarchy ruled over accepted the argument that the Kings were placed there by God. If a person is chosen by God there is little to discuss and those who didn't accept it were not treated well. People could be arrested, tortured, and killed. Many lost their heads not agreeing with the king.
Both the President and a monarch rule over people.
Picture having a cat, a dog, a parrot, and a gerbil. It'd be pretty hard to manage all four, eh? Now imagine having four cats. Much easier! It's the same with monarchs and religion--it's easier to please several people of the same religion than it is to please several people of different religions. Probably the bigger reason, though, is because the monarchs thought that their religion was the only "correct" one.
They are bad. Sometimes the monarchs are mean or evil.
By asking people, or having people complete a survey.
lots
Because people think there so beutiful and try to keep them as pets and they do not eat them because monarchs have poisin in them
No. This is complete nonsense.No. This is complete nonsense.
The European revolutions of 1848 were a series of rebellions throughout Europe in 1848. Absolute monarchs at this time were humiliated by having to listen to the common people and forced to give up their political power, shift more power to their subjects, and accept Constitutional monarchies,
The fact is it didn't scientific and technological advancements led to a situation where people became empowered by having work and better education. the days of the obedient serf were coming to close. We still have monarchs but their power as such is practically non existent.
They led to a shift in power from feudal lords to common people and monarchs.
Many people have faith which is having a complete trust or confidence in something. The importance of having faith in ones life is simply having something to believe in.
The monarchs can gain salary from his/her job position. For example: he/she should serve people for contributing his/her ability to reach the satisfying result.