by maintaining power
He is jealous of Caesar's power, both in terms of his power as a dictator and his power as a demagogue.
they both have a leader and both are a type of government.
Adolf Hitler was not a weak dictator. His power was absolute. He made many of the government's decisions personally. Only in the last weeks of the war did his health significantly alter his exercise of power.
The best synonym for autocrat is "dictator." Both terms refer to a leader who holds absolute power and governs with authority and control over a country or people.
in my opinion he was both. but mostly a dictator then a murderer
In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.In 44 BC Julius Caesar was both made dictator for life and assassinated.
France has had both.
With the exception of the 20th and 21st centuries, during which there was an incredible variety of government styles in the Arab World, the Arabs almost exclusively self-governed in the style of a Caliphate. The Caliphate was structured in one of two ways: either (1) the Caliph was a theocrat who was both the dictator of secular affairs and the head of the Sunni Islamic religion OR (2) the Caliph was either the the dictator of secular affairs or the head of the Sunni Islamic religion and delegated the other duty to a secular Sultan or religious Sunni Sufi Saints, respectively.
Both
they both lead and command people
The closest in meaning to tyrant is dictator - although the meaning is not precisely the same. Tyrants and dictators are both rulers who exercise unrestrained power, and usually in a manner that is harmful to the people they rule, but while tyrants are necessarily bad rulers, the theoretical concept of the benign dictator does exist, a ruler who has vast power but uses it for the benefit of those he or she rules.
Julius Cesar was a good man at first, he was a military hero who seized power and made reforms, but that all changed after he had become emperor. When Julius Cesar became emperor he had all this power, soon after, Cesar started taking advantage of his power which led to his death.Just a slight correction in terms here. Julius Caesar was never an emperor. He was a dictator, which was a political office under the republican form of government. Although the powers of both emperor and dictator were identical, there was a great difference in the power structure. An emperor had supreme power and could designate his successor. A dictator (ideally) had supreme power for a limited period of time and had no authority to appoint a successor.