Want this question answered?
The Living Constitution.
Any court can interpret the constitution, but the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter on constitutionality.
A "literalist" would interpret the Constitution just as it is written, rather than interpret its meaning in context.
The constitution isn't interpreted using evolutionists thinking. It is a foundation for government and by definition a philosophy like evolution doesn't fit within the interpretation of the constitution.
Interpretation is left up to the Supreme Court and other lower courts. Agencies have no authority to interpret the Constitution.
The constitution isn't interpreted using evolutionists thinking. It is a foundation for government and by definition a philosophy like evolution doesn't fit within the interpretation of the constitution.
An evolutionist is answering this question.
There is no interpretation in the Constitution. It is timeless, and was intended to be upheld as long as America stands.
Apply and interpret the constitution in legal cases
judicial restraint.
Supreme Court
it is the supreme courts role is to interpret the constitution