It is safest to assume that any image created since 1923 is protected by copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise.
With permission, yes.
Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.
nothing really unless you have permission to use it
It is an image that has been put as copyright. This means others may not use this image without permission, or legal action can be taken.
Yes, so long as it is a public domain image, and not a copyrighted one.
Not without a license.
To use others' copyrighted works, you need an exemption in the law (such as fair use) or permission from the copyright holder.
It is permissible to use a copyrighted image if you cite the source it came from.
There is an image site with a similar name. However I don't know whether the site is safe or what it has on it.
No; by printing it, you have infringed on the rightsholder's exclusive right of duplication.
Yes, under US copyright law, an unpublished image is copyrighted for 120 years, unless you know who the author was, in which case it is copyrighted for 70 years after that person's death. So, for example, an unpublished image created in 1890 by a person who died in 1943 would still be copyrighted. On the other hand, if the image was published, then different rules apply, and if it was authored by a foreign citizen in a foreign country, different rules may apply. An image published 120 years ago by a US citizen in the USA, even with a proper copyright notice and renewal or registration would have expired. As a rule of thumb, anything published prior to 1923 in the USA is public domain. Again, anything UNPUBLISHED could still be copyrighted for well over 120 years.
Yes, unless you own the copyright to the image, or have authorization from the copyright holder.