A CRT monitor is much heavier and is a lot bigger front to back. It connects directly to a mains electricity supply and is power hungry. When it it working, getting close to screen will make the hairs on the back of your hand stand up.
A LCD monitor of the same viewing size is lighter and physically flatter front to back. It often has an external power supply and uses much less power.
It is cheaper than a LCD monitor.
No they do not.
Yes. As long as the output is VGA. There is no difference in the standard between CRT and LCD.
CRT monitors use a beam of electrons to form the picture - LCD's use microscopic pixels. CRT's need large amounts of electricity to form the picture - LCD's work with low voltages.
yes
At this point, I would say that a CRT had no advantages over a LCD monitor. The LCD is probably cheaper, it takes up less space, is easier on the eyes, and provides better revolutions.
As LCD display technology improves, it now beats CRT for clarity and image stability. CRT based computer monitors are no longer mass produced and existing CRT monitors are usually several years old. As they age, the image becomes softer so there will be few CRT displays that can compare with a modern LCD screen.
CRT: Use more power, lower resolution LCD flat screen: price
No lcd is flat screen crt ( cathode ray tube ) is heavy, junky and very large
Width/depth wise, yes
Yes you can, be sure to find the correct size mount for your lcd, or crt monitor.
The Philips 200CW is a LCD or Liquid Crystal Display. See Related Link