An atomic bomb works by forcing two pieces of radioactive material together, resulting in a chain fission reaction. This reaction releases an enormous amount of energy in a very short time creating a massive explosion. Hence, atomic bombs are primarily dangerous because of their powerful blast wave and the extreme heat of the explosion. Additionally, radioactive particles are released into the air by the blast. These particles continue to emit dangerous gamma rays causing radiation sickness and water and food contamination.
Nuclear power plants do not hold enough radioactive material to create an explosion so there is NO POSSIBILITY of the plant exploding. However, if the plant were to be poorly maintained, a "melt-down" could occur. In this case, the nuclear reactions would become too hot for the enclosing structure to contain and the facility would begin to melt, causing fires and allowing the release of radioactive particles. It is very difficult to stop a melt-down and containment is the best solution. This is what happened at the disaster of Chernobyl in the Soviet Union (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster). No other such case has ever occured although there was a scare at Three Mile Island (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident).
Those are two different names for the same thing.There actually is not a difference in the atomic bomb and nuclear bomb. Saying 'Nuclear Bomb' is a modern way of saying 'Atomic Bomb'.
No. A nuclear missile is a rocket of some kind with an atomic/nuclear bomb as its warhead.
A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon. Even Wikipedia agrees. The use of either term as a search argument redirects the answer to the article Nuclear Weapon. A link is provided. from benjaminmarkiewicz that dont make any sense a nuclear bombs blow travels 100s of miles and is more powerful cause its the newly invented bomb and the atomic bombs blow travel is under a nuclear bombs travel rate
Nuclear fission
The terms "atomic bomb" and "nuclear bomb" are general terms and can pretty much be used interchangeably. That said, there isn't any difference between them, and one is not more powerful than the other in that light.
This is called nuclear fission and it is what powers nuclear reactors and of course the wonderfully horrendous atomic bomb...
If you mean "atomic" as in the Atomic Bomb, then the word "nuclear" could be substituted = Nuclear Bomb.
Those are two different names for the same thing.There actually is not a difference in the atomic bomb and nuclear bomb. Saying 'Nuclear Bomb' is a modern way of saying 'Atomic Bomb'.
Atomic bombs are a type of Nuclear bomb and there are 2 types of nuclear bombs. The second type of nuclear bomb is a hydrogen bomb.
An atomic bomb is a nuclear bomb.It can kill lots and lots of people
No. A nuclear missile is a rocket of some kind with an atomic/nuclear bomb as its warhead.
18th May1998, but its not atomic bomb (its nuclear bomb)
A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon. Even Wikipedia agrees. The use of either term as a search argument redirects the answer to the article Nuclear Weapon. A link is provided. from benjaminmarkiewicz that dont make any sense a nuclear bombs blow travels 100s of miles and is more powerful cause its the newly invented bomb and the atomic bombs blow travel is under a nuclear bombs travel rate
A nuclear bomb or atomic bomb
Nuclear bombs can be dangerous as during a atomic bomb explosions, it produces radiation. The effects of radiation could be that it can cause permanent damage to cells and can cause mutation. Along with this, it could cause severe burns to the skin.
That is by definition.
Nuclear reactions in a nuclear reactor are controlled reactions. The reactions in the atomic bomb are not controlled reactions