0
Estimates say that anually; 60 to 100 million veribrate animals worldwide are being used for testing. 70% of these are mice or rats. Most animals are used in only one procedure: animals either die because of the experiment or are euthanized afterwards. Scientists and governments state that animal testing should cause as little suffering to animals as possible, and that animal tests should only be performed where necessary. Although such principles have been welcomed as a step forwards by some animal welfare groups, they have also been criticized as both outdated by current research, and of little practical effect in improving animal welfare.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How is animal testing inhumane?
There are pro's and cons to animal testing. It can help discover life saving treatments for humans and other animals. However, it is sometimes said that animal testing is inhumane because the animals are in pain, or are not taken care of. However, there are government standards on research labs. The animals do not feel pain, and even though they may die eventually, they often live as long as a normal household pet.
What happens to the animals used in animal testing?
Many people use animals for testing products such as toothepaste or makeup. They want to test them on animals because then they can find out if it causes irritations or if it is a good product to sell. They sometimes also use animals for testing drugs and fluids.
Is animal testing cruel?
No. Animal testing is a necessary part of research. Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not existed, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today. When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs: Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort. Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible. Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner. Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Remember, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences. This is no more flawed than a person trying to rescue and free animals, only to unknowingly and unintentionally kill them. It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.
Why is animal testing good for humans?
it's good because it means humans don't suffer and it will benfit us for years as due to animal testing we have learnt more about illness and we know how to cure them. also you dont have to ask for the animals permisson to use them.
How many animals a year die from animal testing in new zealand?
Animal testing occurs in New Zealand. Here are some paragraphs from other web pages that provide the scope of such testing. In 2008, there were 341,520 animals used for research, testing and teaching - a 38.5% increase of animal testing from the previous year and the highest number used in the last ten years. The majority of animal experiments conducted in New Zealand are aimed to increase the profits and productivity of the agricultural industries. The rest is for commercial and medical purposes. In New Zealand, as in many countries, laboratory animals (mainly rodents) and farm animals (mainly cattle and sheep) are used in research, testing and teaching - commonly referred to as RTT.
Cosmetics testing on animals?
For 2000 years animal have been tested on. Recently, most has stopped thanks to animal rights activists. Many meat eaters are against cosmetic testing. To set standards around this issue the animal welfare act was made. It made standards for the care of laboratory animals and all others. To make sure they were following the rules, they had random inspections of the laboratories. Sometimes they have to use drugs and painkillers for the animals. It says for the researchers to actually see if animal testing is necessary. When animal testing is discussed we need to know if the benefit of humans is worth the pain to the animals. We don't need makeup unlike medicine that saves people's lives. The fda answers this. While it is not necessary many companies use animal testing for their research.
When did animal testing first start?
animal testing started in the years of Aristotle (384-322 BC) and Erasistratus (304-258 BC). & was a very cruel and painful for the animals.
Is Animism wrong?
Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!
Can animal testing be used for cloning?
yes it can but it has not been used in years
Is animal testing wrong?
Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!
How many animals died in 2008 because of animal testing?
In a 12 year span, as much as 100 million animals died from testing. Equally chilling is the treatment of exotic animals for their fur and meat. an example: Huntingdon played a big role in the testing that took place to bring Splenda to the market. An estimated 12,800 animals died in the process according to a published report in a recent scientific journal. The time span for this was only about 1-2 years
Do animals die in pain from animal testing?
Some poisonous/ harsh chemicals are ingested by the animals and causing them to die. Or animals switch environments, like monkeys in space, and come back to their original habitats and are mentally disabled and cant survive anymore.
