People would have more personal freedoms under a democratic government in Egypt. This would mean more say in local, regional, and national politics, along with fairer elections.If Egypt were to adapt a new democratic form of government, people's personal freedoms would certainly change. For one, they would have an equal say in how the country is mandated and governed. Second, they would be able to keep a majority of the money earned via work and business. Lastly, Egyptians of all faiths would be guaranteed religious freedom and protection across the board.
this is called a democracy
Myanmar is a country that continues to face political unrest and conflict as its citizens fight for democracy. The military's control over the government has led to ongoing protests and violence as the people strive for greater freedoms and a more democratic system.
Liberal democracy promotes individual freedoms, protects human rights, and allows for peaceful transitions of power through elections. It provides a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power and ensures accountability of the government to its citizens.
No. In a democracy the restriction of freedoms should never be an issue. If this happens, it will cease to be a democracy.
To secure citizens freedoms of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The purpose of democracy in the Philippines is to ensure that the government is accountable to its citizens, protect their rights and freedoms, promote participation in decision-making, and prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few. It allows for the peaceful transfer of power through free and fair elections.
The citizens of Cuba have limited rights and freedoms. Among their freedoms are their right to healthcare, the right to free expression and opinion, a restricted freedom of assembly that is monitored by the government, right to an education, and religious freedom.
A limited democracy is a form of government where the power of elected officials is constrained by a constitution or other form of legal framework. In this system, there are limits on the government's authority, and certain individual rights and freedoms are protected. This is in contrast to an absolute democracy, where there are no constraints on the government's power.
the freedoms of government is not the answer
The principle of limited government does not have the purpose of restricting the power of any part of the government. Instead, it aims to limit the overall power of the government as a whole by defining its scope and protecting individual rights. This principle ensures that the government does not become too overreaching and infringe upon the rights and freedoms of its citizens.
No. Some kingdoms have high standards of living and freedoms for their citizens. Some "people's democratic republics" are tyrannies. The decision should be based on something other than name of the government.
Citizens have economic freedoms with some government regulation