answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)

Brown was argued twice: once in 1952, then again in 1953 after Chief Justice Vinson died and was succeeded by Chief Justice Earl Warren. In 1952, the Respondent's attorney, John Davis argued the following:

  • Congress established segregated schools in the District of Columbia (which is under federal control) before, during and after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, demonstrating those who initiated the Amendment did not intend it to prohibit segregation. Further, of the 30 states that had ratified the Amendment when it was adopted in 1868, 23 maintained segregated schools.
  • The issue of desegregation should be a political question (left to Congress), not a judicial one.
  • The Court's own precedents supported the "separate but equal" doctrine many times since the Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) decision. (Davis cited: "...Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education, Gong Lum v. Rice, Berea College v. Kentucky, Sipuel v. Board of Regents, Gaines v. Canada, Sweatt v. Painter, and McLaurin v. Oklahoma, and there may be others for all I know, certainly this Court has spoken in the most clear and unmistakable terms to the effect that this segregation is not unlawful. Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education, Gong Lum v. Rice, Berea College v. Kentucky, Sipuel v. Board of Regents, Gaines v. Canada, Sweatt v. Painter, and McLaurin v. Oklahoma, and there may be others for all I know, certainly this Court has spoken in the most clear and unmistakable terms to the effect that this segregation is not unlawful.")
  • Davis claimed the Clark's doll test was unscientific, and discussed a replication of their study conducted by another expert witness, identified only as Trager, who conducted the test on Philadelphia school children in integrated schools and found their preference for the white doll and belief that the African-American doll was bad was more extreme than the opinions of the Southern, segregated children.
  • Davis quoted the opinion of W. E. B. Dubois, an African-American intellectual who opposed desegregation: "It is difficult to think of anything more important for the development of a people than proper training for their children; and yet I have repeatedly seen wise and loving colored parents take infinite pains to force their little children into schools where the white children, white teachers, and white parents despised and resented the dark child, make mock of it, neglected or bullied it, and literally rendered its life a living hell. Such parents want their children to "fight" this thing out-but, dear God, at what a cost!"

    He goes on:

    "We shall get a finer, better balance of spirit; an infinitely more capable and rounded personality by putting children in schools where they are wanted, and where they are happy and inspired, than in thrusting them into hells where they are ridiculed and hated."

  • Parents should have an opportunity to be consulted and determine whether they wanted their children in an integrated school.

In 1953, Davis added the following arguments:

  • Some southern school districts (for example, Clarendon, SC) were predominantly black and enjoyed newer schools and better facilities than the minority white population.
  • Integration would create a situation in that district where the classes were integrated 27:3, with the majority African-American, which he didn't believe would be useful to anyone.
  • Race and racial tensions had existed for "some 60 centuries," an argument he used to deny segregation was caused by, or reinforced, racism.
  • Individual states and school boards should be allowed to determine for themselves whether to integrate, because they had a better understanding of community-level issues.
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The petitioner (like a plaintiff) always makes the first argument, so Thurgood Marshall argued Brown's side first, and John Davis argued for the respondent (like a defendant), the Topeka Board of Education, second. The petitioner has the right to reserve part of his or her allotted 30 minutes to rebutt the respondent's argument.

The order of argument follows a standard pattern:

  1. Petitioner argues (up to 30 minutes, may share time with co-counsel, may save time for rebuttal)
  2. Respondent argues (up to 30 minutes)
  3. Petitioner's rebuttal (if applicable)
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Marshall was the first African American justice and spent his life fighting for equality. As a young man he had experienced discrimination first hand. He was the lawyer for Brown v Topeka and argued that separate but equal was not equal at all. He was a great man and powerful ally for equality and civil rights for all.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

lolly

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the Board of Education's argument in Brown v. Board of Education?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What were the effects of the brown decision?

The Brown vs Board of Education was a decision about school. The courts declared government could not provide "equal but separate" educations. Schools had to desegregate.


The argument made against brown v board of education by southern states was?

Mickey Mouse


What was the boards argument in brown vs board of education?

Cause whites did not like blacks and then it was segregation time.


What Supreme Court case resulted in the integration of public schools?

The Warren Court ruled segregated schools were unconstitutional in Brown v Board of Education, (1954), and ordered integration to take place "at all deliberate speed" in Brown v Board of Education II, (1955).


Schools started integrating in the 1950s as a result of?

brown vs board of education


What court case established the principle that separate education is inherently unequal?

Brown V. Board of Education


What did linda brown have to do in the brown vs board of education?

She was the girl that couldn’t go to the close all white school. That is how the brown vs board of education law started!


Which decision by the warren court determined that deprecating children by race in school was unconstitutional?

brown v. board of Which_decision_by_the_Warren_Court_determined_that_separating_children_by_race_in_schools_was_unconstitutional.Ryan


Which event occurred last founding of the NAACP brown v board of education reconstruction of plessy v ferguson?

Brown v. Board of Education


What case overruled the separate but equal law?

Brown v. Board of Education


To what did the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education refer?

what did the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education refer?


What is a summary of Brown vs Board of education?

Yigcjokoghjkjcdxc