Roman artist's focused on landscape painting.
Ares in Greek mythology is painted as a violent fighter and most Gods tend to stay away from him. Mars, however, is portrayed more as a leader of legions in Rome; a role model. Still violent, yes, but not as rejected.
It depends on the period, really. Early Greeks painted more than they sculpted, so there are more representations of their gods on pottery and walls. The Romans didn't really do that. Their idols were usually in statue form, even when they were small.
There are many subtle differences between Greek and Roman art, and while most Roman art is an imitation of Greek art, there are some parts that remain different. Painting and sculpting people is one such area. The easiest way to think of it is that the Greeks preferred to produce an ideal artistic form while the Romans preferred realistic portraits.
Roman artists focused on landscape painting. (APEX)
theres no difference apart from people demanding and suppling
The significant difference between prehistory and history is prehistory is history to old people that has happened now for example and iPhone is problaly an artifact to very old people.
No. No matter what color people are they are still people. We all have the same parts and hearts it doesn't matter what the outside looks like.
the significance of segregation was to show the difference between the people
communist ruled by military democracy "governed" by the people
There are many subtle differences between Greek and Roman art, and while most Roman art is an imitation of Greek art, there are some parts that remain different. Painting and sculpting people is one such area. The easiest way to think of it is that the Greeks preferred to produce an ideal artistic form while the Romans preferred realistic portraits.
People cannot be excluded from using goods while they can be excluded from using individual goods.
In parenting kindness and caring are important. In people in general being kind and caring describes a whole lot about the person.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
Hobbes believed that people were naturally evil, while Locke did not.
sectionlism
(Apex) Hobbes believed that people were naturally selfish and violent, while Locke did not.
The lives of ordinary people.
Interrelationship.
Both are people.
we r people and they are monkeys
Sectionalism from J LO K.S.B.