How would you discuss the ways in which developments in scientific knowledge may conflict with the idea about the origins of life developed by different cultures?

Answer 1

Science conflicts withs everything, inc science its self, however the idea that 'man was created by an "invisible being" who also, just so happened to create everything, is far to much use of an imagination for a logical scientist. But on the other hand the ideas about the origins of life developed by different cultures conflicts with science because, although science does offer lots of proven facts those facts are incomplete and have huge parts missing, for example "the missing link" between ape and man, science/scientists then fill in the missing parts with they're own, ha, logical guesstimate. And so why would different cultures then believe any modern guesstimate's? They already know and have their own knowledge of creation, that's been passed down from generation to generation from what they believe to be from the beginning of time (in most cases).

What i find hilarious is while one conflicts the other both are (I'm not sure if this the right word) susceptible to each others proven facts and/or actual evidence. EG Christian cultures up until recently believed that there is no life any where else IE on other planets, because, in short, it would be written in The Bible, but after recent developments in science has shown them the universe and the gazillions of galaxies that are in it, the church is now open to and excited by the idea . & over the years scientists research, has proven that some of the "stories/writing's" in the bible are in actual fact scientifically correct!!