It all depends on the manner in which the original case was "dismissed." If it was Dismissed WITHOUTprejudice, that means that the judge found some legal deficiency with the case but did not bar the prosecution from re-filing it after the deficiency was corrected. If it was Dismissed WITH prejudice that means that the judge threw it out entirely and barred the prosecutor from bringing the exact same charge for the exact same offense again. It sounds like your 'dismissal" may have been the first type.
Question is not clear - too much conflicting info - define "threaten." If a case is "dismissed," it cannot be "re-opened," it would require re-filing the same charge (which would stand a 99 & 9/10% chance of being dismissed again), or the filing of new charges. It sounds as if the police are seeking your assistance in getting your husband into court. Why?
It depends on if it was dismissed with prejudice (no reopen), or dismissed wihout prejudice (can be brougt again). Some criminal cases are 'filed' or 'continued without a finding' -- these cases can be brought if the defendant does something unlawful within the time period that was stated
If you were arrested for a felony crime - and the charge was dismissed before ever reaching the trial stage - you are NOT considered to be a felon. And although your record may reflect an arrest for the offense, it will also show that the charge was dismissed.
You can always make a motion to reopen. Whether or not it will be granted depends on your reasons for failing to appear.
No, a credit card company will not reopen a charged off account. They may choose to grant you a new line of credit, but this would be rare.
If the case was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice he could open it whenever the deficiencies cited by the dismissing judge were corrected.
In Pennsylvania, it's 13 months.
You must determine the reason that the original case was DWOP'd. If it contains a 'legal defect,' correct the defect, and then re-file the case as if anew.
This wording is changed but is very little different from the original question. It is becoming more obvious that there is more to this question than the writer is revealing. The case against WHO was dismissed? Why would he be "re-arresting YOU?" It sounds as if the police are intent on on gaining your assistance in getting your husband into court. I wonder why? The one thing I can say with certainty is, once a case is "dismissed," the same case cannot be "re-opened." If the detective has enough probable cause to arerest you on a new charge it is not outside of his discretion to "urge" you to cooperate.
If the statute of limitations has not passed, you would be able to refile. However, almost all civil lawsuits are going to be past the limit at 18 years.
reopen
The past tense of reopen is reopened.