I don't think you can say that. Radioactive decay is an inverse exponential process, where the number of disintegrations per unit of time is a function of the amount of material present. We measure this in half-lives, with half of the remaining material removed after each half life. (1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, etc.) Population decay in the absence of a Birth Rate, however, would be a function of the probability of death, and the highest predictor of that probability is age. You would not expect people to live longer just because there are fewer of them. Population decay would depend on the distribution of ages in the population. If that distribution were uniform, the decay would be linear, not inverse exponential. If the distribution were highly non uniform, such as everyone remaining being the same age, then the population decay would be abrupt, with everyone dying at the same statistical time. In order to say that population decay is the same as radioactive decay, you would have to say that half the population is younger than the median age, and half of the remaining population is younger than the median age of that subset, and so forth. Since the birthrate is not proportional to the population, as only younger people have babies, this is not true.
Radioactive material is warmer than the surrounding material because radioactive material is constantly breaking down. When material breaks down, that means that energy is constantly getting released. When energy is released, it produces warmth.
Both the adverb strongly and the noun strongness are forms of the adjective strong.
Forcefully
the adverb of strong is strongly.
laser
Radium is strongly radioactive.
Yes, they strongly resemble soot.
Being strongly radioactive, americium is dangerous.
Sebastian is Viola's brother. They strongly resemble each other.
As a strongly radioactive element francium is dangerous.
Americium is strongly radioactive and dangerous for the life and the environment.
Francium is a strongly radioactive element and is of course dangerous.
As a strongly radioactive element francium is dangerous for humans beings.
Yes, because francium is a strongly radioactive element.
Protactinium is a chemical element strongly radioactive and dangerous in any form.
Because radium is extremely rare, difficult to prepare and is strongly radioactive and dangerous.
He believed strongly in education