0
No, he is not. Strict constructionalists only want the Constitution interpreted as it was written, and many scholars and judges who agree with that view tend to espouse a very conservative judicial philosophy. Mr. Obama, while a former professor of constitutional law, is more of a judicial moderate: he seems to believe that the law evolves and thus, the constitution can be adapted to changing circumstances.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who is a loose constructionist president?
Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist president, but during his presidency he made many loose constructionist decisions. (during his 1st term)
Was Thomas Jefferson a liberal constructionist or a strict constructionist?
a strict constructionist
Was Thomas Jefferson a strict constructionist or a liberal constructionalist?
He was a strict constructionist. He viewed interpretted the Constituion narrowly. Strict constructionist were also called antiFederalists.
Strict constructionism Jefferson?
Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist. Hamilton was a loose constructionist.
What president was a strict constructionist and espoused the restricted view of executive powers?
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Loose construction or strict construction what was Thomas Jefferson's view on the constitution?
He was a strict constructionist. He viewed interpretted the Constituion narrowly. Strict constructionist were also called antiFederalists.
Was Alexander hamilton a strict constructionist or a liberal constructionist?
he was a Liberal constructionist, i believe
Can you strict constructionist in a sentence?
i didnt get the answer
What type of constructionist was Thomas Jefferson?
he was either strict or liberal
Was Andrew Jackson a sectionalist?
no he was a strict constructionist
What strict constructionist would likely?
sureno 13 for life
What is the difference between a liberal and a strict constructionist?
A Strict constructionist is always fighting agains the civil liberals and rights. The term Liberal Constructionist refers to persons who believe in a variety meanings for different parts of the constitution. They do so by arguing for different meanings on constitutional representations.
