No. A lahar carries far less power than a nuclear bomb. However, large explosive eruptions, which can lead to lahars, can be as strong as or stronger than a nuclear explosion.
No. A nuclear missile is a rocket of some kind with an atomic/nuclear bomb as its warhead.
Those are two different names for the same thing.There actually is not a difference in the atomic bomb and nuclear bomb. Saying 'Nuclear Bomb' is a modern way of saying 'Atomic Bomb'.
No, an atomic bomb uses fission, but a nuclear or thermonuclear bomb combines fission and nuclear fusion. Therefore, a nuke is more powerful than an atom bomb.
No, they are not the same. The atomic bomb was a specific weapon developed during World War II, while the nuclear age refers to the period starting from when nuclear technology and weapons became a significant part of global affairs, which continued past the use of the atomic bomb.
Yes , the two terms are synonymous with each other .
Yes, it generally is but a nuclear plant could refer to nuclear reactors which are basically the things that produce the power. So in essence, yes, a nuclear plant is the same thing as a nuclear power station
Exactly the same thing as a TNT bomb of the same yield.
They are both the same thing.
Actually, niether because they are both the same thing.
This question makes no sense as an atomic bomb is a nuclear bomb and vice versa. They are the same thing.
no it has the same explosion rate of quantumatics a nuclear bomb
Pretty much the same thing it would do to anyplace else.