Is a rainbow an example of an intelligent design?

Answer 1

A rainbow is an example of refracted light, caused by refraction and dispersal of sunlight through water droplets in the air. Look at a glass or crystal prism; you'll see the same effect. Was that prism an example of intelligent design? We know the answer to that because we know somebody deliberately manufactured it. We cannot know about the rainbow. Whether the rainbow was designed by a higher intelligence is impossible to tell; that is a matter of personal belief. However a rainbow happens, it is still a thing of beauty and we should be grateful for such beauty in our lives. Maybe we don't actually need to stress over whether someone or something deliberately made it happen, but just enjoy. After all, do we question the existence of tiny kittens and little fluffy puppies? And would the decision to take one into our home be influenced by whether the little one was designed or just happened? It may indeed be debatable if rainbows are evidence of design. What is more intriguing is the fact that we can perceive a rainbow as beautiful at all. This would appear to have no evolutionary advantage. The fact that we see the beautiful colors, have discovered its physical properties, according to the laws of physics does not explain why we judge it to be beautiful. The human brain is said to be an extremely complex organ. That is something which some would point to as evidence of intelligent design - not the rainbow itself but the brain and the perception of it. If the brain is an example of intelligent design, then so must the rainbow be. All brains of all creatures are extremely complex; complexity doesn't necessarily suggest intelligent design any more than lack of complexity suggests a thing "just happened". I do understand many people prefer to believe nothing "just happened", but we'll never truly know, will we? To make a fuss over the origin of brains and rainbows is to detract from their great beauty in our perception. There is a quantum leap in complexity from a rainbow to the human brain. One is also a living biological system and the other is molecules of water suspended in the air (or very fine water droplets -however one wishes to define it). Thus they are two completely different things.

While animal brains are indeed complex, as far as we know animals don't wonder about rainbows as we humans do. There are significant differences between the brain of even the most 'advanced' animal brain and the human brain. In any case I was trying to point out that while the rainbow itself is probably not evidence of Intelligent Design, the human brain which perceives it and discusses it may well be. ____________________ The question isn't to do with our perception (or our dog's perception) of a rainbow. It asks whether the rainbow is an example of intelligent design. Not being a theologian, I can't claim expertise on that subject but understand it's a new way of saying 'creationism' for those who have trouble with the concept the universe and its inhabitants and attributes simply evolved in ways that worked, but now consider the term 'creationism' a bit fundamentalist, or possibly just old-fashioned. If the Earth - and the universe - are examples of intelligent design, or 'created', then rainbows, humans, animals, trees, rocks, clouds and orchids and so on were all intelligently created. If not, they evolved, in one way or another. You can't have it all ways. If God or something very like God created everything we can't say, but God only reallycreated humans; the rest just kind of happened, rocks, rainbows and all. So the answer is, if there was - or is - intelligent design involved (is it ongoing?), a rainbow is indeed an example of this. But, a rainbow is no less beautiful whether we believe an entity deliberately created it, and the brain with which we perceive it, or whether we simply accept it as the gift it is. However it got up there.