The concept of anti-matter is scientific fact. The quantity in the universe, and any ability to control such anti-matter has to date been the premise of many Science Fiction stories.
yes its scientific fact. basically, it's the opposite of matter. atoms have positively charged nucleus with negatively charged electrons flowing around it. anti matter is just the opposite. negatively charged positron in the nucleus, with positively charged anti protons moving around it.
1st Answer
No. Antimatter is the direct opposite of matter: the antimatter equivalent of electrons are positrons (electrons with a positive charge) and the antimatter equivalent of a proton is an antiproton (negative charge). Neutrons and antineutrons, being neutral are different not in charge, but in magnetism: antineutrons have the opposite magnetic moment (magnetic moment is another electromagnetic property). Antimatter is the opposite of matter.
2nd Answer
Yes. Antimatter has rest mass, so it is matter. The difference between ordinary matter and antimatter is just that some of the properties of the particles (notably electrical charges) have opposite sign.
This terminology is confusing: it makes the term "matter" ambiguous, and conveys a misleading impression that sometimes leads people to the misapprehension that antimatter might have negative mass. It is perhaps unfortunate that the terms "ordinary matter" and "antimatter" prevailed in usage over an earlier alternative: "terrene matter" and "counterterrene matter".
No. Antimatter is a kind of matter, in which certain properties are the opposite of normal matter. For example, the anti-proton has a negative charge instead of a positive charge; the anti-electron has a positive charge instead of a negative charge; some other properties are changed, too, in antimatter.
No. Antimatter is a kind of matter, in which certain properties are the opposite of normal matter. For example, the anti-proton has a negative charge instead of a positive charge; the anti-electron has a positive charge instead of a negative charge; some other properties are changed, too, in antimatter.
No. Antimatter is a kind of matter, in which certain properties are the opposite of normal matter. For example, the anti-proton has a negative charge instead of a positive charge; the anti-electron has a positive charge instead of a negative charge; some other properties are changed, too, in antimatter.
No. Antimatter is a kind of matter, in which certain properties are the opposite of normal matter. For example, the anti-proton has a negative charge instead of a positive charge; the anti-electron has a positive charge instead of a negative charge; some other properties are changed, too, in antimatter.
Yes. While it is possible, it is very expensive. A study in 1999 by NASA led to pricing antihydrogen at $62.5 trillion per gram. Some scientists claim it to be one of the costliest materials to make, as only a few antiprotons are produced in reactions in particle accelerators, and there is higher demand for other uses of the accelerators.
add. But positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons, are widely used in PET scans (Positron Emission Spectroscopy).
Its charges are reversed - the regular atom posses negatively charged electrons and positively charged protons.An antimatter atom would be consisted of positively charged electrons (positrons) and negatively charged protons (antiprotons).
Two things here.
One. Matter cannot be created or destroyed. That's one of the laws of physics. For this reason, Anti matter, which is just matter made of anti particles, also cannot be created..or destroyed.
Two. Antimatter has always existed, but no, we have not learned a way to harness it.
We can't harness or hold it but it can be used for things such as PET scans in hospitals. This is positron emission tomography and it works by detecting positrons, which are antiparticles, that are emmited by a radionuclide tracer.
No. Antimatter is a kind of matter, in which certain properties are the opposite of normal matter. For example, the anti-proton has a negative charge instead of a positive charge; the anti-electron has a positive charge instead of a negative charge; some other properties are changed, too, in antimatter.
"Frankestein" is a Science Fiction novel,or gothic science fiction.
Some would say that science fiction excludes fantasy but Arthur C. Clarke said, "Any significantly advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Science fiction authors have mixed science fiction with all other forms of literature. There are science fiction lyrics to songs, science fiction poetry, science fiction mixed with humor, science fiction mixed with westerns, science fiction mixed with romance.
Yes it is Science Fiction
The Red Pyramid is a science fiction book.
it is a science fiction
The opposite of Science Fiction would be science fact.
The fact that it is set in space and it is made up.
A science-fiction film will contain elements of fact and speculation to further the plot of the film . Fact and Fiction , what could be possible and what may be probable . 2001 : A Space Odyssey is an excellent example of a film with both elements of science and fiction .
Stanley Schmidt has written: 'Aliens and alien societies' -- subject(s): Science fiction, Authorship 'Analog Science Fiction and Fact, Mid-December 1986 (Volume CVI, No. 13)' 'Argonaut' -- subject(s): Fiction, Insects, Entomologists, Human-alien encounters, Cognition disorders 'Analog Science Fiction Science Fact, December 1986 (Volume CVI, No. 12)' 'Unknown Worlds' 'Tweedlioop' -- subject(s): Protected DAISY 'Analog Science Fiction Science Fact, June 1986 (Volume CVI No. 6)' 'Analog Science Fiction and Fact, February 1986 (Volume CVI No. 2)' 'Analog Science Fiction and Fact, October 1986 (Volume CVI No. 10)'
That is science fiction fantasy. Such a drive does not exist.Fanciful, fictional phrases in the question include . . .antimatter driveelectromagnetic enclosusuerfaster than lightwarping the space
The opposite of science fiction is typically considered to be realism or non-fiction. Science fiction often involves speculative elements and futuristic technology, while realism focuses on portraying events and experiences as they could occur in the real world.
Yes. The first issue of the magazine was published as Astounding Stories of Super Science in January 1930. The Magazine has variously been called Astounding Stories of Super Science, Astounding Stories, Astounding Science Fiction, Astounding Science Fiction and Fact. In 1960 it changed its name to Analog Science Fiction and Fact. As of 2009 it was still in print under that name.
never
No way, it was science fact. If you do all that manual labor you can beat up anyone.
There have been a few incidences where the speculation in science fiction has in fact become true. The most famous example is Arthur C. Clarke's prediction on synchronous satellites. The science can be fiction or already possible. What matters is that you have a believable character using that science or perhaps a warning where that science could take us in the future.
Science Fiction is a fiction based on science.
It is science fiction. Science fiction generally bases a fictional story about a debatable scientific point like time travel, aliens and other disputed ideas.