Biological is better because it contains enzymes which break down the (food, dirt ect...). It combines with the substrate to break down these. It is better to use non-biological washing powder for sensitive skin and it is kinder and less aggressive.
hope this helped :]
the quantity is better than biological method because it is the bst
Biological washing powder mean it contained enzyme that targeting specific type of stain such as protein, starch and fat by breaking down and make it dispersed through water easier at lower temperature than a conventional non-enzyme base detergent.
WHAT? Why would you ask that? Were equal, women are better than men at somethings and men are better than women at others. And there is no biological proof. There is no proof.
It does not prevent communicable disease completely due to a lot of germs floating in the air. Without touching anyone, you can still breathe the air they breathe and get sick. Washing your hands will HELP prevent diseases being spread, especially after using the restroom or taking out the trash, etc. You never know what type of bacteria you just exposed yourself to.
Molecular biology allow us to study better about how molecules interact, how they communicated to perform a biological function. This will in turn help to understand how the DNA sequences of a species is being evolved from its ancestor. Also how this changed in the function of the protein it produces(evolved protein with better adaptation).
Do washing machines make the world a better place.
the quantity is better than biological method because it is the bst
yes. a hundred times better. Actually not necessarily. Washing by hand works extremely well if done properly. In fact, a company named Dyson in the UK actually designed a washing machine which better imitates the hand washing action to get the clothes cleaner. People tend to assume that just because something is automatic it works better, but this is not always true. Washing by hand does a much better job of flexing the fabric. Of course, it's a lot more work too.
yes
Hand washing is not always better than machine washing, but when it comes to stains it is likely a better choice. Machines use hot water, which can set some stains, and wash many clothes at once, which can re-deposit stains on another piece of clothing. Hand washing allows the washer to treat each stain depending on the type of stain and the fabric.
No, it isn't
Biological washing powder mean it contained enzyme that targeting specific type of stain such as protein, starch and fat by breaking down and make it dispersed through water easier at lower temperature than a conventional non-enzyme base detergent.
Yes
LG fully automatic washing machine is better than IFB due to its great reliability and most energy efficiency.
WHAT? Why would you ask that? Were equal, women are better than men at somethings and men are better than women at others. And there is no biological proof. There is no proof.
The CDC reports that soap and water does a better job at removing germs, but a hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol makes sense to use if soap and water are not available. If your hands are visibly dirty or greasy,
Yes, a commonly done procedure "acid washing" is done with muriatic acid. BUT don't do it if it's not needed, because you are removing a layer of your plaster. It is also very dangerous. It is probably better done by a professional.