0
Is it legitimate to hold people accountable for crimes committed during wartime?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Of course it is. Many of the horrible things that happen directly as a result of war, and participation in war, are not crimes. There are guidelines and understandings about what is acceptable and what is not acceptable behavior during war. Over and above that, there are actions that are considered criminal, and the fact that these acts are done during war time does not permit or excuse them. For example, the Jewish Holocaust was criminal to an unimaginable degree, and it was more than legitimate to hold people accountable for that, independent of war activities. If anything the world should be embarrassed that we were not more aggressive seeking out and prosecuting those responsible. Mass genocides are never acceptable whether there is a declared war or not.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How were axis leaders held accountable for after the war?
Any surviving Axis Power leaders and people involved in the mindless torture of people were tried in the International War Crimes Court and everything is investigated by the International War Crimes Committee.
What crimes were committed in rome?
death and rape
What crimes did bushrangers commit?
Bushrangers usually committed murder, robbery, theft, assault and other crimes.
How many war crimes war crimes did the SS comite?
The atrocities committed by the SS cannot be quantified .
Which was a fundamental principle expressed by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremburg following World War 2?
both national leaders and their followers are responsible for their wartime actions
Is it legimate to hold people accountable for crimes committed during wartime?
Yes. A crime is a crime and harms others and/or the society whether in wartime or peacetime.
Should it be legitimate to hold people accountable for crimes committed during war time?
Yes especially during war time.
What was the reason for the Nuremberg Trials?
The Nuremberg Trials were conducted after World War II to hold Nazi officials accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression. The trials were meant to establish legal precedents for prosecuting individuals responsible for atrocities committed during wartime.
Why was Abraham Lincon assassinated?
For the war crimes he committed against the South. Obviously the Commander and Chief of the armed forces is a legitimate target.
What was the outcome of the Nuremberg trials?
The Nuremberg trials resulted in the conviction of several top Nazi officials for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. Many were sentenced to death or received lengthy prison terms. The trials established principles of international law and set a precedent for holding individuals accountable for committing heinous acts during wartime.
Was the Nuremberg trial unjust?
The Nuremberg trials were considered just, as they were conducted to hold high-ranking Nazi officials accountable for their role in perpetrating war crimes and crimes against humanity during World War II. The trials helped establish principles of international law regarding individual responsibility for acts committed during wartime.
What were the defendants in the Tokyo and Nuremberg Trials charged with?
The defendants in the Tokyo Trials were charged with crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, while the defendants in the Nuremberg Trials were charged with crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. Both trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their roles in the atrocities committed during World War II.
Why are the Nuremberg trials so important?
The Nuremberg trials were important because they established a legal framework to hold individuals accountable for committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. They set a precedent for international law and shaped the concept of individual responsibility for atrocities committed under the guise of state authority. Additionally, they aimed to provide justice for the victims of the Holocaust and other wartime atrocities committed during World War II.
What are the reasons why the Nuremberg trials created?
The Nuremberg trials were created in response to the atrocities committed during World War II, aiming to hold individuals accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. They sought to establish a precedent for international law and ensure that those responsible for these crimes faced justice.
What did the allies do at the Nuremberg trial?
At the Nuremberg trial, the Allies prosecuted high-ranking officials of Nazi Germany for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other atrocities committed during World War II. The trial established key principles for holding individuals accountable for such crimes, regardless of their official position.
Who was charged with war crime and prosecuted at the Nuremberg trials?
germans
Why were the Nuremberg Trials held?
The Nuremberg Trials were held to prosecute prominent leaders of Nazi Germany for crimes they committed during World War II, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. The goal was to hold individuals accountable for their actions and establish legal precedents for future international criminal trials.
