No. Nationalism can occur peacefully, but by and large nationalism requires the realignment of borders and the establishment of new governments, such actions almost always lead to violence.
Nationalism can be dangerous because it can inspire passionate radicalism and violence in defense of the nation-state in question. A perfect example of the passionate violence that was inspired by nationalism were the Yugoslav Break-Up Wars, where Croats, Serbs, and Bosniaks engaged in very bloody wars based on nationalist concerns.
Nationalism can be a tool of manipulation by the leadership of a group or nation and can lead to grave violence.
Mahatma Gandhi
ORNIT SHANI has written: 'COMMUNALISM, CASTE AND HINDU NATIONALISM: THE VIOLENCE IN GUJARAT'
Not always.
Revolutionary Nationalism in Ireland is believing in the right of nationalists to use physical force and violence as their method to achieve their ultimate aim - an independent Ireland completly free of British control.
no they are not always equivalent.
I think it was the pan african movement because they fought with violence and that is an affect
The dictator expressed his displeasure for the rebels with great violence upon their families.
nationalism is more powerful in undeveloped countries rather than Europe because downward countries always use to see problem against their country and they have more sense of thinking about nationalism
The violence in the Balkans in the 1990s was primarily caused by a combination of historical ethnic and religious tensions, the breakup of Yugoslavia, and the desire for self-determination among various ethnic groups. Nationalism, political manipulation, and the legacy of past conflicts also played significant roles in fueling the violence.
Not always. Video games only sometimes cause violence but it happens rarely. Violence is often cased by oter things