• 
• 2 answers

470

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

He had a strong way of using nationalism and people would be proud to be on his side because of so many successes.

He used the feelings of Nationalism to help them defeat enemies.

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

Irish nationalism is only within the province of Ulster in Northern Ireland (part of the UK). A minority of the population want to leave the UK and become part of the Republic of Ireland.

• 
• 1 answer

First of all, sweetheart, Nazi Germany never had Zionist policies.

There has been a continuous Jewish population in Israel for a little over 3,000 years

now, although there have been times when their numbers dropped very low.

The modern migration of Jews back to Israel began sometime late in the 19th Century

(that was the 18 hundreds). That was the time when the individual Jews and the small

communities of Jews, who always knew that they weren't actually welcome anywhere,

began to share that realization with each other. If there were any who hadn't actually

realized it yet, it was hard for them to miss the way that as soon as things began to go

bad for this country or that one or the other one, there were always loud voices high up

in that country who blamed all of the country's problems on the Jews who lived there.

So the idea began to take hold among the Jews that it might actually be possible to start

rebuilding Jewish culture and society in the place where they always belonged, in Israel.

As Czarist Russia was falling apart and things were going from bad to worse for

Russian Jews, many of those who were able to leave Russia did so. My grandparents

went to Argentina and to the US. Many other Russian Jews went to Israel. As Germany

was going downhill in the 1920s and 30s and blaming it on the Jews, great numbers of

Jews continued to ignore what was happening and believe that it would get better.

Great numbers of other Jews who were able to leave Germany did that, and migrated

to many other countries around the world, including Israel. By the time the Nazis had

solidified power and created their policies specifically aimed at Jews, in the late 1930s,

Jews were no longer allowed to come and go as they felt like it. "Zionist" policy is a

policy that says Jews should be able to establish a Jewish nation in Israel. That was

not the policy of Nazi Germany. The policy of Nazi Germany said that Jews are inferior

human beings, that it is Germany's job to clean them off of the Earth, and that special

railroad lines and death camps should be built to do the job. And that's exactly what

Germany did, from 1938 until 1945, capturing and killing millions of Jews (and others)

in Germany, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, France, and Holland. After Germany lost the

Second World War in 1945, most of the Jews who were still alive in those countries

left, and went to other places. A lot of them went to Israel. Israel became a country

in 1948, and since that time, there have been migrations to Israel of Jews from many

countries, including large numbers from Russia, from Ethiopia, from Yemen, and from

the US and Canada.

In 1937, Ze'ev Jabotinsky proposed a mass exodus of Polish Jews to Mandatory

Palestine, but before he could pitch the idea to the Polish Jewish communities

(3.3 million people ... of whom 3 million would be mass-murdered), the British

opposed the entry of any Polish Jews into Mandatory Palestine fearing Arab

reprisals. If you wish to specifically discuss immigration to Mandatory Palestine

during the height of the Holocaust (1939-1945) you should note that the British

White Paper of 1939 further minimized the legal Jewish immigration to a trickle.

This widely prevented Jews from settling in Mandatory Palestine until after 1948

when the State of Israel was declared and opened its borders.

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 4 answers

Nationalism is a force which bond members of a particular state together.

• 
• 1 answer

NO

• 
• 1 answer

it was sought to reestablish a Jewish homeland in Palestine

• 
• 1 answer

when you read the news in your country/city you can always relate to them

• 
• 1 answer

They didn't. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 did, strictly speaking.

Well nationalism has it roots in French revolution, at late XVII and at begining of XIX century some nations began to feel it national pride, before that countries just were loyal to king, there was beleaf that kings power was given by God, that was apsolutistic monarchy...When French revolution ocured, people was angry and miserable for bad life, while aristocracy lived good, so as the church. French revolution bolished king, and putted people as prime, that is diference between monarchy and republic, republic belogns to people while monarch at least in those days were property of king and aristocracy not people...So when Napoleon came to power, people were thinking he is the descendence of French revolution...Ofcoures Napoleon disminished the Inquisition that was one of mechanism of repression and terror...When Napoleon wars happened, some of major empires that had kept other nation in bondage for many years were busy fighting Napoleon...That gave opening to some nations to form national identity, and to fight their captors....So end of XVIII and begining and middle of XIX was time of revolution and nationalism...So during 1804 to 1813 we have Serbian revolution that fights Turkish Otoman empire that lead Greece to fight also Turks and some of Balkan nations, than middle of XIX century Oto von Bismark unified Germany, than Garibald united Italy...Anyway nationalism was creation of national fealing trow Europe, thanks to Napoleon wars...

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

independence day

• 
• 1 answer

National unity: political stability, economic stability, cultural improvements.

International Regocnition: hegemony, either more or less influence in global polictics.

• 
• 1 answer

== == After unification, Germany was the strongest military power on the continent. Germany's position geographically was between large military powers. Otto von Bismarck had to be as sure as possible that no one would attack Germany, at least no coalition. First, in 1879, Bismarck made a secret alliance with Austria-Hungary. In 1881, Bismarck signed a tri-treaty with Russia, Austria, and Germany: the Alliance of Three Emperors. In 1882, Italy joined this alliance, making a triple alliance along with Austria and Russia. Under Bismarck, Germany maintained a stable and reliable foreign policy, because Bismarck maintained an anti-imperialistic stand and maintained diplomacy. Germany managed to stay on good terms with just about everyone but France. Industrialization progressed dynamically in Germany. German manufacturers began to capture domestic markets from British import. The German textiles and metal industries surpassed those of Britain in organization and technical efficiency and usurped British manufacturers in the domestic market. Germany became the dominant economic power on the continent and was the second largest exporting nation after the US. By the turn of the century, the German metals and engineering industries would be producing heavily for the free trade market of Britain. By the time of World War I (1914-1918), The German economy switched to supplying its military with the proper equipment needed to fight the war. This included the production of rifles (Gewehr 98), pistols (P08 Luger), and heavy weaponry (Maxim machine gun, Minenwerfer mortar, and several other heavy and light artillery pieces). Additionally, Imperial Germany was leading in the sectors of Physics and Chemistry so that one third of all Nobel Prizes went to German inventors and researchers.

• 
• 1 answer

Nationalism encouraged the development of large corporations

• 
• 1 answer

To answer this question one must first assess the subtle differences between the terms, 'Nationalism' and 'Imperialism'. Nationalism is the doctrine that your national culture and interests are superior to any other whereas imperilasim is a policy of extending your rule over foreign countries.

Thus, it is easy to assert that nationalism in a country would cause them to want to gain more power - power leads to wealth, more stability and prosperity. As power comes from many things but mostly from wealth as it is a thing that everyone, armies, citizens and governments alike, need. Therefore, we arise to the conclusion that countries in Europe in the early 1900s were looking for ways to further their wealth. The consequences of their quest for wealth can still be seen today, much of the developing world having been pillaged as European powers sought to take over countries in Africa and such to harness their resources.

Imperialism, in this new light, you could consider as a product of nationalism. Indeed if there is no desire to further your country, why would you bother to invade countries?

However, all this argument is based upon event before the 'Great' War although during the war these same aspects can be seen. What else but nationalism, with all Britain's pomp from their golden era bursting forth, caused Britain to go and try to defeat Germany (-and do you not usually fight to conquer and to imperialise). What else but the combined wants of three empires bustling with Nationalist feelings caused the war?

Nationalism could be called patriotism but this suggests love and a feeling of pride in your country. Rather, Nationalism is an intense and lustful desire to further your country-a feeling much more intense.

• 
• 1 answer

Mahatma Gandhi played an important role in the Indian nationalistic movement. He promoted non violence and was the leader (not politically) in the Indian freedom movement

• 
• 1 answer

One of the main problems in answering this is that there are several different definitions of Zionism that are used.

1) Believing that the Jews have the right to a State on the historic Land of Israel.

2) Believing in a Jewish-dominant State where Non-Jews are relegated to a second-Class status.

3) Being part of a world-controlling cabal.

The third, is, of course, simply another form of Anti-Semitism where the cabal is called "Zionists" instead of "Jews" since people immediately recognize the "Jewish cabal" claims to be Anti-Semitic and have a harder time recognizing the same thing with a different label.

The second is a view by those who accept Israel's existence, but want to create a line between Left-Wing Zionism and Right-Wing Zionism. The latter is more akin to the types of nationalism we see in Europe currently.

Even assuming that the first definition is used, not all Jews share the same understanding as to what Israel means. Many of them are Zionists, and live in Israel. Others are anti-Zionists (this group is primarily made of ultra-religious Jews who do not recognize a Jewish right to a State and very liberal secular Jews who see Israel's Jewish Nationalism to be inherently problematic). They are Jewish, and share the same believe as the Israelis, but they don't see the point in having a Jewish state. These Jews cherish their ancestry, but just practice Judaism in other countries. The majority of Jews are pro-Zionism, and a much smaller minority are against Zionism.

• 
• 2 answers

It depends entirely on the country in question. Sometimes it was on account of patriotic fervor in the wake of a war (South-North German Nationalism), sometimes is was based on religious crusades (Greek Nationalism), sometimes it was on account of conventions and political dissertations (Jewish Nationalism), sometimes it was in response to colonial repression and a search for identity (Arab Nationalism), etc.

• 
• 1 answer

Nationalist music uses themes and motifs specific to a people, such as folk music or rhythms and harmonies inspired by them. Nationalist composers can sometimes have political goals, but not always. See related links for the wikipedia article on nationalism, which is rather good and gives many examples.

• 
• 1 answer

Corruption - the easiest way to destroy an economy

Democracy - the best way to get the people and their government on the same track

Freedom - a limit to democracy. Protect the rights of unpopular minorities from the mob.

Frugality - spend less than you take in

Peace & Justice - without justice there is no peace, without peace there is no justice

• 
• 1 answer

+ : the people feel they re important/in control. it gave Germans hope in a society with high unemployment. generally i think its good.

positive effects of nationalism are it brings together nations that are within a nation and negative effects are that it could lead to war, genocide and ultranationalism

nationalism is one of the main causes of WWI

• 
• 1 answer

Nationalism: Devotion to the interests of one's nation.

Colonialism: A nation's policy of exerting control over foreign nations/territories.

== == == ==