Absolutism (Political)

The Enlightenment despot who famously traveled among the peasants in disguise to learn about their problems was Frederick the Great of Prussia. He believed in the principles of the Enlightenment and sought to understand the needs and concerns of his subjects. This practice reflected his commitment to reform and his desire to govern more effectively by being in touch with the realities of his people's lives. Frederick's efforts aimed to implement policies that would benefit his nation and improve the welfare of his citizens.

France's government was an absolute monarchy primarily due to the belief in the divine right of kings, which held that monarchs derived their authority directly from God and were accountable only to Him. This system centralized power in the hands of the king, who wielded complete control over the state, law, and governance without legislative constraints. The monarchy was further reinforced by a lack of strong institutional checks, such as a parliamentary system, which allowed the king to maintain authority over both the nobility and the common people until the French Revolution challenged this structure.

Montesquieu was critical of absolutism in France, advocating for the separation of powers as a means to prevent tyranny. In his work "The Spirit of the Laws," he argued that concentrated power leads to despotism, and he believed that a system of checks and balances would promote liberty and justice. He viewed absolutism as detrimental to individual freedoms and the overall health of society. Ultimately, Montesquieu's ideas laid the groundwork for modern democratic thought and governance.

Absolutism was successful in Russia due to the centralized power of the monarchy, particularly under rulers like Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, who expanded state control over the nobility and military. The vastness of Russia and its diverse population made a strong, centralized authority essential for governance and stability. Additionally, the state’s ability to modernize and reform the military and economy helped consolidate power and suppress dissent, fostering an environment where absolutism could thrive. Economic growth and territorial expansion further reinforced the legitimacy and authority of the absolutist regime.

Religious absolutism can lead to intolerance, discrimination, and the suppression of differing beliefs, limiting individual freedoms and causing social division.

Relativism is the belief that truth and morality are subjective and can vary based on individual perspectives or cultural norms. Absolutism, on the other hand, holds that there are universal truths and moral principles that are objective and apply to everyone regardless of context or culture.

some monarchies today have symbolic or powerless parliaments that the monarch can dissolve or change at will. Countries are considered to be absolute monarchies when the power of their rulers are not restricted under their constitutions.

Relative location.

Whether absolutism or democracy is more effective depends on a specification of what is 'effective', the ability to measure (and strictly compare) that specification, and the implementation of that model on these types of governments. Unfortunately, in political theory, these questions are widely disagreed on, since the purpose, origin, and use of politics is a constant topic of debate, and one's take on these vital issues heavily guides their idea of effectiveness. For example, a Libertarian would likely represent effectiveness as negative freedom and, in this case, believe democracy is superior to absolutism. Conversely, a divine theorist may suppose that authority is delegated to an absolute authority by some objective right, and so absolutism is more effective (or morally justified) than democracy.

Monarchs justified absolutism by claiming that they possessed a divine right to rule, meaning that their authority came directly from God. They argued that they were chosen to govern and protect their subjects, and that their rule was necessary to maintain order and stability in society. Additionally, some monarchs promoted the idea that they were uniquely qualified to make decisions and provide guidance, as they were believed to possess superior wisdom and knowledge.

To be enlightened there is a process to follow. The first step on the path of enlightenment is to realize what the truth is and what the myth is. We must realize that we are enveloped in the darkness of ignorance. Therefore, the first step is to identify all the myths, the mythology, the superstitions, the rituals, the fake news of this world. The moment we realize our ignorance, then the next step is to overcome the ignorance by the realization of the truth, realizing that we are not this body and mind, we are the Divine Soul. When we realize this, we are not the body, mind but we are the Soul, then to be truly enlightened we must be able to transcend the ME the mind and the ego, because the mind and the ego will constantly battle to destroy our enlightenment. If we are able to transcend the cravings of the body, the mind and the ego, then we can be truly enlightened.

limiting the rights of a minority group

Theoretically speaking, absolute power. Practically speaking, their power was limited to varying extents by the aristocracy/religion or another traditional authority.

Absolute monarchy. A dictatorship implies a republican form of government where the leader rules as a "first citizen", whereas in a monarchy, the ruler is a sovereign who embodies the state. Pharaohs fit the latter.

give sentence using despotic

Czar Nicholas ll

"..'King and Parliament struggled to determine the roles each should play in governing England."

Well Peter the great for example modernized the Russian army and the Russian navy and improved Russian farming. now king Louis XIV, everyone in the kingdom thought that his authority was coming directly from god.

peter the great

Peter the great and Catherine the Great were considered great absolute monarchs. The reason for this is that they were interested in making Russia better and stronger.

It was the "so called" Divine Right of the Monarchs.