• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

Well all in all yes. Yes fascist economics improved the Italian economy. Fascist economics aren't really radical at all as many might think. Mussolini aligned himself with industrial interest and forged alliances with Italian capitalist. Mussolini had no real economic plan,but reacted to changing situations. Mussolini's economic goals were simple,1 modernize Italy's backward economy,2 remedy Italy's lack of natural resources. Making a alliance of industrialist,workers and the state, Pro-corporatism all in all. First hand Mussolini reformed the highly abused tax system, dis-oped of inefficient state owned industry, cut government costs, and introduced tariffs to protect the new industries. Development available domestic resources, and aggressive commercial policies searching aggressively for raw material trade deals and to solve Italy's resources problem committed strategic colonization,Libya and Ethiopia. Life insurance was shifted to private enterprise. For his first years in power from 1922-1926 he adapted a liberal economic policy,however the liar declined and the liberal policy's dropped. From 1927 on wards Mussolini adapted Italy into a corporation state. Massive work programs to gain popularity, massive construction of roads, including in the countryside. Also, drained massive swamps and confuted them into roads and railroads. Italy's economy improved slowly overtime and by the great depression came in 1929 Italy fared off more than any industrialized nation. Italy's massive industrialization and to bring capitalism into fascist ideology paved the way by the 1930's to a spike in the Italian economy. Mussolini became admired throughout the world for Italy dodging the worldwide economic depression of the early 1930's. Admired by men from Churchill, Roosevelt, and Hitler. His intense nationalism, declaring roman Catholicism as Italy's official religion and the Independence of Vatican city, united the Italian people behind him, even much of Italy's far left came to respect him to,mostly because of his socialist upbringing in his youth. Italy's baby boom of the 1920's,1930's and 1940's was the pure responsibility of Mussolini's fertility program. By the mid 1930's more of the Italian economy was invested into the Armed Forces. Though, Italy suffered a economic boycott after his invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, except for Germany,Islamic nations,other poorer European nations who couldn't afford not to do business with Italy. So, Mussolini just incorporated capitalism into fascist ideology, and just his own spin on it.

• 
• 1 answer

It is a form of government where the people are led by a dictator, or a small group of people. The dictator has a vision of what he wants his country to be like and pushes the population towards his goals. A good example of this is Italy during World War II, led by Benito Musolini (sp?).

• 
• 1 answer

None really. Fascism is a totalitarian political system based on the exhaltation of the nation above all else and th absolute subordination of the individual to the will of one leader. It permits no rights or freedoms or liberties of any kind. Private property is retained but all economic resources are at the call of the state. Fascism also tends to be very militaristic. Capitalism on the other hand is an economic system which can be accomodated under different kinds of political systems but which works best under, and tends to foster a tendency toward, democracy. Capitalism requires private property and the freedom to exchange capital, property and labor. In order for people to feel confident in a capitalist system there has to be legal protection for property rights. This fosters the rule of law. When people come to understand that their economic rights are inherent and are properly protected by law they tend to take a greater interest in the political situation and begin desiring to exercise their political rights. Fascism, being totalitarian, has much more in common with Communism than with Capitalism. Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, although they hated each other, learned from each other and applied each others methods to consolodate and expand their tyranies. Michael Montagne

• 
• 3 answers

It stands for National association zepth international

• 
• 1 answer

Italian socialists who differed with the main-line Socialist Party's anti-war (WWI) stance as well as hard-line nationalists. Also, many Fascists were war veterans. Fascism was a strange, convoluted mixture of right-wing symbolism (nationalism, respect for figure of authority) with a left-wing execution (totalitarian rule, view that elites have an enlightened dedication to the common good).

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

If by Nazi you are asking if Geiger was a member of the National Socialist Party, then Yes he was.

His work for the Nazi party, if completed, would have produced an atomic bomb. Only lack of access to Uranium and heavy water thwarted their efforts.

So he was both a declared Nazi and working towards their goal.

I think that's pretty clear.

• 
• 1 answer

Represented the wealthy and supported a society with classes.

• 
• 1 answer

Actually, there are 14 basic characteristics of fascism: 1. powerful expressions of nationalism 2. distain for the importance of human rights 3. identification of enemies 4. supremacy of the military 5. rampant sexism 6. controlled mass media 7. obsession with national security 8. religion and ruling elite tied together 9. protection of powerful corporations 10. power of labor suppressed 11. disdain for intellectuals and the arts 12. obsession with crime 13. rampant cronyism 14. fradulent elections Obviously, your question could take a novel to include all the factors associated with fascism.

• 
• 1 answer

Mein Kampf (My Struggle)

• 
• 1 answer

Hatred towards Obama, or other righteous men.

• 
• 1 answer

Nuremberg

• 
• 2 answers

With regards to governments, tyranny has a long historical record that even in modern times can be seen. And, of course when tyranny is practiced, it's never called by that term by the tyrants. Tyranny is also labeled by such terms as dictatorship, fascism or totalitarianism. A single leader or group of leaders imposes its will on the citizens of a nation, past nation and current ones too. Generally speaking these types of governments only allow one political party to exist (theirs) and impose economic, and political policies on their citizens. They may also restrict religious practices.

• 
• 3 answers

• 
• 1 answer

Fascism can only spread where it is allowed to spread. Hitler knew if he picked the jews to be the enemy most europeans would not care so much. This is appeasement, they were not jewish, so it was ok to treat them badly. so it spread easily, only because no one bothered to stop it.

• 
• 1 answer

similarity between nazism and fascism :

both believed in one man rule and did not believe in the republic form of government.

they believed in crushing their opponents. They believed in conquering the world and rejected all the treaties signed by them. But both helped in making the economy of their countries strong. Both also believed in a strong military and used it to great use. M.J.KHAN WAZIR.03454347457 both are nationalistic.Fascism believes in Italian nationalism while Nazism believes in German nationalism.. both ware totalitarianism. they believed in expansionist policy.. they were anti communist.... M.J.KHAN WAZIR..03454347457

• 
• 3 answers

No, not strictly speaking. Mao Zedong, Joseph Stalin, and Benito Mussolini are better examples. The system Hitler established in Germany had some soft-fascist characteristics, but I would not classify him as a pure hardcore fascist.

• 
• 1 answer

To a small extent yes;

On one hand you have great fear of communism generated by the 1916 Russian revolution.

Take America during this period;

The journalist Kenneth Roberts wrote that "social democracy gives off a distinct sour Bolshevik odour". He was part of the 100% Americanism movement that preached sermons and lectured at university although hit only spread its message to a few, the fact that this fear was here illustrates that many of the Super capitalists in America were tending towards capitalism.

The Palmer raids in 1919 demonstrate effectively the fear that many people had of communism. After his house was bombed the then Attorney General A.M.Palmer created a "red scare", using the General intelligence division to arrest around 6,000 "foreign radicals", 5400 were later released due to lack of evidence. The public lost interest as they saw the threat had been exaggerated. The ability of Palmer to create such a scare in the first place in America and also in many other Western countries.

Count Carlo Sforza noted that "the privileged classes wanted security against a "red danger" more imaginary than real - and to them the best bulwarks against the "red danger" were the two dictators in Berlin and Rome".

Indeed a British envoy stated that "These Japanese how violent, how barbarous! Just the stuff we need to destroy Moscow" and the same was true of the Germans and the Italians and their view.

This Mussolini quote illustrates the great ideological divides between fascism and "We declare war against socialism, not because it is socialism, but because it has opposed nationalism". The charisma of the two infamous fascist leaders meant that they could sell fascism as a way to overt socialism to many leading conservatives. This prompted many prominent bankers, financers and business chiefs to donate to fascist parties.

Therefore fear of socialism and communism's played a major part in the development of fascism but bourgeoisie hate of socialism also contributed to the origin of Fascism.

Fascism was a combination of pre-existing ideologies such as nationalism and militarism. What caused these ideologies to fuse together was WW1 which discontented Italians and Germans after Versailles, and its effect to split the political left between internationalist and nationalists. Fear of socialism (amongst the general population and not just the upper-class) also contributed.

As fascist parties expanded and no longer depended heavily on the support of business they adopted a very anti-capitalist approach - turning on its creators.

Mussolini detested the "super capitalism" that caused the depression and even criminalised 1st class train cabins.

Hitler stated that the bourgeoisie "know nothing except their profit, "Fatherland" is only a word for them". This conflict in views between moderate conservatism and fascism made the clash inevitable the tragedy was that British and French Tories did not realised it 10years too late.

So yes Fascism was the answer of many German and Italian conservatives to the growing red threat in their own countries. British and French conservatives failed to see how fascism turned on its creators and adopted a policy of non-interventionism as they saw it as a means to stand against Moscow.

• 
• 1 answer

They were led by General Francisco Franco Bahamonde .

• 
• 1 answer

Niether he was a Republican who became a Dictator.

• 
• 1 answer

Italy

• 
• 1 answer

no... but it would be pretty funny to wach! no... but it would be pretty funny to wach!