I don't really see an all-out ground war happening.... the public is a bit war weary by this point, and another major offensive will be politically damaging for whatever party lets slip with it. ISIS/ISIL is an amalgamation of groups, and used to operate as Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, and they operated in our AO. I'm sure I'm not the only who'd like the opportunity to go back and kill a few (or more) of them off, especially if they're fighting openly now, but these decisions are ultimately made by politicians, who may or may not pay attention to what military advisers have to say. Plus the likely outcome of such a ground offensive would likely be them returning to the same style of insurgency they had used previously.
A lot of the problem stems from a very factional government in Iraq, and that did wonders to help ISIS with increasing their numbers. So long as that problem exists within the Iraqi government, so will the problem which led to the rise of ISIS.
No. As a purely military question, the United States could completely destroy ISIL. However, there is no political will in the US government to launch another full-on war in Iraq. Certainly, the current US practice of simply bombing ISIL targets is insufficient to defeat them. In the meantime, ISIL can cause problems for the United States, like the Boston Marathon forms of terrorism. ISIL has nothing near the power necessary to overthrow the US government.
It is not a question of military power; in this regard, the United States could completely destroy ISIL. However, there is no political will in the US government to launch another full-on war in Iraq. Certainly, the current US practice of simply bombing ISIL targets is insufficient to defeat them.
The US is at war with ISIL, which is made up of a fraction of the Iraqi population, but is in alliance and accord with the current governments of the Republic of Iraq and Iraqi Kurdistan. The US Occupation of Iraq ended on 16 December 2011.
US PresidentHarry Truman was US President at the end of World War 2.
Cold war maybe; hot war no.
We're all not almost going to the end of all, which is where we're not going at the end, but at the beginning of going to the end, we are going to the end, where we will no longer be going to the end.
1974
Truman at the start and Eisenhower at the end
when did the war of 1812 end
Harry S Truman was US president at the end of World War 2 in 1945.Harry Truman
ISIL is being funded by several Middle Eastern states, likely Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Additionally, ISIL stole a large number of funds (billions of US dollars) given by US forces to the Iraqi government when it conquered the city of Mosul in June of 2014.
The president of the US at the end of WWI was Woodrow Wilson.