No. Titanium costs approximately 10 times more than steel and titanium is only lighter that steel. You actually will need more titanium than steel for armor (strength to size issue). Tanks don't have problem with heavy armor so weight is not an issue for them.
Tanks were used in World War 1 and the Allied tanks were better equipped than the germans' although the germans' were bigger and i think they were faster the Allied tanks were superior to their enemies' WW1 was when tanks were used in large scale for the first time but i think they were invented some time before the war but not long before. hope that helps!!! :-)
A a rare combination of low weight and high strength
titanuim and nickel by Brandon Lopez
the highest and hardest grade stainless is titanium 316Ti
titanium
it is used on tanks
what sort, heavy vehicles, no its a compound
it is mainly used in the army for the armour of tanks i hope this helps
yes in some cases. the A-10 pilot sits inside a titanium armor plate "bathtub" while flying.
The US tanks used by Israel in the 1973 war with Egypt had greater size, thicker armor and smaller guns than the Soviet tanks used by Egypt.
Titanium .
Panzer=Armor. Therefore your question is asking "what impact did armor have in WWII?" Armor=Tanks=Panzer was simply an evolution process. Before tanks, men fought USING HORSES. In WWII every combatant nation (the smart ones) exchanged their HORSES for tanks! All combatants in WWII had tanks (panzers, armor); the USSR had T34 medium tanks; the US used M3 Stuarts & Lees; the French & Italians used Renaults and Fiat tanks; Japan had Type 97 medium & Type 95 light tanks; Germany had Mk I thru 7's. Just part of the evolution of mankind...horses to tanks, swords to rifles!
I am guessing that they do it for maximum speed (titanium is lightweight) and for good protection (titanium is pretty strong).
I am guessing that they do it for maximum speed (titanium is lightweight) and for good protection (titanium is pretty strong).
Panzer=Armor=tanks. Automobile makers generally produce tanks.
nsma,dnad
In WW 1, the armor on tanks was not THAT thick, and a heavy machine gun with armor piercing ammuntion COULD disable a tank. They were NOT invulnerable.