answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It never was a philosophy and Freud developed his theory of how the mind works he was the father of psychology and analysis.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

DJ HD tu

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Psychology made the transition from philosophy to science with which event?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Movies & Television
Related questions

What event helped to shape this philosophy?

that event


What are the aims of psychology and goals?

the aims and goals of Psychology is to firstly understand the course of a particular event.


What event helped to shape this philosophy of William golding?

I need this answer....


A essay on a current event in science?

There are many reasons why you should write an essay on a current event in science. You should do this so that you learn about the event for example.


What is a first leg in a Triathlon?

The first leg means the first event, and that would be Swimming. Then Transition 1, then cycling, then transition 2 then running. :)


The major event that influenced the development of psychology as a profession was?

World War 2


What is terminal miocene event?

Terminal miocene event is the transition from miocene to pliocene. The miocene climate is similar to the modern climate, dry and seasonal.


What is the difference between transaction and event?

in transition the states are changed from one state to another but in event the signals are changed or trigered with respect to that signal.


What event helped to shape William Golding in his philosophy?

World War II


Earth science event related to more than one branch of earth science?

no


The political philosophy of leaning to the right or left dates back to what event?

French revolution


Can science prove determinism?

No. Determinism is not a scientific thesis. Instead, it belongs to the philosophy of science. It helps to think of there being three levels. First, there is the world itself. Second, there are scientists studying the world, particularly its regularities. Third, there are philosophers of science who study the scientists who are studying the world. For example, when a scientist notices regularity, he or she might propose a causal law. Causal laws have an "if -- then" form: if an event of this type occurs, then an event of that type occurs. If this happens, then that happens; alternatively, this causes that. Scientists attempt to fashion causal laws into comprehensive scientific theories. Therefore, scientists are trying to understand what causes what. Notice that scientists take the notion of causation for granted. By way of contrast, philosophers of science do not. They wonder about what scientists are doing. For example, when a scientist claims that "If X, then Y" or "X causes Y", the philosopher of science may ask, "What is a cause?" The question "What is a cause?" is not itself a scientific question; scientists take for granted the notion of a cause. Philosophers of science do not. "What is a cause?" is a question in the philosophy of science. It is a philosophical question. In other words, issues in the philosophy of science are more fundamental than issues in science. Whether or not determinism is true is one of those issues. Therefore, it's like the question about the nature of causation itself. This does not mean, though, that issues in the philosophy of science are more important than scientific issues. All it means is that they occur on a different level.