Acid chloride is more reactive than aldehyde. Aldehyde is more reactive than ketone, which is more reactive than ester, which is more reactive than amides.
Methyl alcohol reacts with hydrochloric acid to form methyl chloride and water.
CH3OH + HCl --> CH3Cl + H2O
if you add an alkali to hydrochloric acid, it will neutralise it.
Acid chloride + alcohol ---> Ester + HCl
i.e.;
Cl of acid chloride will combine with H of alcohol to form HCl and ester is released.
RCO-Cl + H-OR ---> RCOOR + HCl
The chemical equatuion is:
(CH3)3COH + HCl = (CH3)3CCl + H2O
yes methyl chloride is more reactive.
The reaction occurs because iron is more reactive then the copper is. The more reactive metal wants to create a compound, which is why it forms iron chloride. Copper, being the less reactive substance wants to become pure and separates from the chloride to be on its own.
Sulfur itself is a non-reactive element... although sulfuric acid is highly reactive.
Yes it does, because Mg is more reactive than Copper
Fluorine is more reactive than chloride. In general, reactivity increases as you ascend a column and as you move to the right in a period (ignoring the noble gases on the far right of the periodic table).
yes methyl chloride is more reactive.
The reaction occurs because iron is more reactive then the copper is. The more reactive metal wants to create a compound, which is why it forms iron chloride. Copper, being the less reactive substance wants to become pure and separates from the chloride to be on its own.
Acid. Its more corrosive. Base is in our soaps etc.
when reacted with anhydrous AlCl3 . in case of acid chloride.. the carbocation is easily formed due to lone pair resonace with the oxygen. but in case of amide. salts are formed when anhydrous AlCl3 ( also Lewis acid) takes lone pair of nitrogen in amide. and N-C bbond is quite strong as their size matches. and a resonance too.
No, acyl chloride is very reactive as both an electrophile or a nucleophile. Fluorine is just very electronegative.
Sulfur itself is a non-reactive element... although sulfuric acid is highly reactive.
Yes it does, because Mg is more reactive than Copper
Why not?They're important reactions for producing alcohols from aldehydes ... usually this is what they're used for; they also produce acids, but that's not nearly as interesting since there are other ways of doing that, and in fact steps are usually taken to prevent converting the aldehyde of interest into an acid, typically by adding formaldehyde as a sacrificial aldehyde (it's more reactive during the acid-forming step because of kinetics, so you wind up with formic acid/formate and the alcohol you wanted in the first place instead of a 50/50 mixture of the alcohol you want and the corresponding acid you don't really care about).
no because cobal is more reactive than copper
acetyl chloride and acetic anhydride are more preferred as acetylating agents because they show great reactivity and produced irreversible reactions in the preparation of other acid derivatives. They can serve as intermediates in the conversation of the less reactive carboxylic acids to more reactive classes of compounds.
Acids always contain hydrogen (H), eg: Sulphuric acid - H2SO4 Nitric acid - HNO3 Hydrochloric acid - HCl The hydrogen wants to cling to the other "bit" in the acid like the SO4 or the NO3 or the Cl. However the metal comes along and is more reactive than the hydrogen. The metal also wants the SO4 or the NO3 or the Cl and being more reactive it gets what it wants. It kicks the hyrogen out of the way and forms a salt, (eg: magnesium chloride, iron sulphate, potassium nitrate) and the hydrogen ends up on its own (H2) For example, this is a word equation: Magnesium + Hydrochloric acid ----> Magnesium chloride + Hydrogen And the balanced symbol equation: 2Mg + 2HCl ---> 2MgCl + H2acid is corrosive- it burns it up
Yes. Chlorine is more reactive than bromine.