answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?

Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results


Where did scientists finally find evidence that supported wegeners ideas?

Mid-Ocean Ridge


What is it that makes an argument inductive?

An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.


Is scientific evidence supported with theories?

You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.


Why was wegeners theory so different?

Wegener's theory of continental drift is supported by a vast quantity of evidence, which is why scientists have accepted it.


What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?

There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.


Are biased statements supported by evidence?

No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.


A theory is supported by?

A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.


How do scientists get empirical evidence?

i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.


What is reasonable conclusion?

A reasonable conclusion is one that is supported by evidence, logic, and reasoning. It is based on careful consideration of all relevant information, and it follows logically from the facts presented. A reasonable conclusion is open to revision in light of new evidence or arguments.


Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?

They use evidence to support their arguments.


How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?

"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.