Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
Wegener's theory of continental drift is supported by a vast quantity of evidence, which is why scientists have accepted it.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
No. Scientists have discovered fossil evidence that mightindicate that there were, at one time long ago, bacteria on Mars. However, the evidence is sketchy; not all scientists agree that the fossils are in fact evidence of life.
There is evidence that CFC's have formed hole in the ozone. These evidence are found by scientists.
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
Mid-Ocean Ridge
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
Wegener's theory of continental drift is supported by a vast quantity of evidence, which is why scientists have accepted it.
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
A reasonable conclusion is one that is supported by evidence, logic, and reasoning. It is based on careful consideration of all relevant information, and it follows logically from the facts presented. A reasonable conclusion is open to revision in light of new evidence or arguments.
They use evidence to support their arguments.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.