North Korea has already built nuclear weapons. So it doesn't really matter whether anyone believes that they should or shouldn't be allowed to do so. The next question would be, should North Korea be allowed to keep its nuclear weapons? It would be better to overthrow the Kim dynasty and take away the nuclear weapons and introduce democracy and reunification with South Korea, but those things would be very difficult to do. The existing Dictatorship is heavily armed and will fight to the death to prevent its own replacement by better government. So, we play a waiting game. If North Korea becomes sufficiently dangerous, the world will react. For now, it is mostly bluster. North Korea has promised to launch missiles against the US, but so far it has not done so.
iraq, north korea
North Korea does. Not South Korea.
Question is kinda academic, as they already have them.
no
because that makes them stronger and us weaker because we are not allowed to make them.
Many countries have nuclear weapons today including the United States. China, North Korea, South Korea, and Japan also have nuclear weapons.
korea
The information given to the general public (me & you) leads to the conclusion; North Korea has nuclear arms, but struggles to maintain the weapons.
yes
They mostly manufacture nuclear weapons.
north korea
North Korea's development of nuclear weapons has served as a major deterrent for Western incursions into North Korea as well as increased fear from democratic neighbors like Japan and South Korea.