Yes,this would be nonrestrictiuve because most pple believe commas come after a long period of sentancess///
Use commas to set off nonrestrictive elements. Do not use commas to set off restrictive elements. A restrictive element defines or limits the meaning of the word it modifies and is therefore essential to the meaning of the sentence.
No, a comma before "which" is not always required. It depends on whether the clause following "which" is essential to the meaning of the sentence. If the clause is essential, no comma is needed; if it is non-essential or additional information, a comma is used.
comma
The non-essential subordinate clause is marked off by two commas, which act as a pair of parentheses. 'My cousin is a doctor' (independent clause). 'My cousin, who lives in Manchester, is a doctor' (non-essential subordinate clause; the information 'who lives in Manchester' is merely descriptive). 'My cousin who lives in Manchester is a doctor' (essential subordinate clause; the information 'who lives in Manchester' distinguishes this cousin from my other cousins who live elsewhere, therefore there are no commas).
Nonrestrictive clauses and phrases are set off by commas. These commas separate additional information that is not necessary for the sentence's meaning but provides extra details.
Both types of clauses use the same type of punctuation, which depends on where they are in the sentence, how long they are, and whether there is some reason to set them off with particular punctuation (dashes, parentheses, semicolons, commas).
You need one comma and one period to punctuate this sentence: If you begin now, you can finish the project by Thursday. Note: Many students add too many commas to their sentences. A comma should set off a clause.
used for giving examples, gives a small pause, to mark off the persons address salutation, in front of a conjunction and after introducing clauses, phrases and words before main clause.
No, names are not set off with commas unless they are part of a list or if a title follows the name. For example, "John Smith" or "Dr. Jane Doe" do not require commas.
No.
Not usually. Ex: I will give you a computer including the keyboard, mouse, and monitor.
The clause "who can cook " is basically an adjective clause because it refers to a noun.For example:The pilot who can cook prepared the food for the survivors." who can cook " refers to pilot.*The question is also whether it is a restrictive or non-restrictive clause. If the pilot is the only one of the pilots who can cook, it is a restrictive clause (the one who can). If the pilot just happens to be able to cook, it is a non-restrictive clause set off by commas, e.g.The pilot, who can cook, prepared the food for the survivors.