"Children should never receive less protection than adults. . . [we must] put an end to adult justification of violence against children, whether accepted as 'tradition' or disguised as 'discipline'."
Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, Member of the UN Sub-commission on the promotion and protection of human rights, Geneva, 2006.
Another View
Yes, I believe a child should get the occasional spanking when it is deserved. Not a beating nor a thrashing and never with anything but an open hand on the clothed buttocks. The spanking should be administered by the parent at the time of the misbehavior with clear reasons why they are being spanked. I personally believe bad behavior should have consequences when time out's and other methods do not work.
Yet Another View
Many parents insist that they don't enjoy spanking their child but they believe it's the best way to change bad behavior. But what if there was a way to change bad behavior without spanking--wouldn't most parents want to try it? Interestingly, there are many ways to discipline without spanking (and without time-outs). The word "discipline" basically means "to teach," and researchers have found that positive reinforcement of good behavior works better than punishment in changing behavior. It's longer-lasting, more internalized, and results are quicker.
No, there just kids. They should be disiplined, but not harshly. No beating or any of that. Just a time out will do when there young, and if there still "bad" when there older, take away something for a short time. But your the parent, you decide if they should be punished or not for whatever thing that they did.
only if they are being bad It should be used as a last resort only, there are many effective ways of disciplining children that do not require you to lay a finger on them. However if a child fails to respond to these methods then spanking is appropriate.
no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, a parent should discipline his or her child. It is not a matter of physical or emotional discipline. It is simply a parent's job to discipline a child.
"Physical harm" can mean many things to different people. A smack on the rump is a fair method of discipline, but beating a child with a piece of wood is certainly not.
no
Children SHOULD be disciplined. Children need boundries and rules in order to grow up to be balanced contributers to society. Parents that don't discipline their children are doing their children harm (and society as well).
Russian parents likely discipline their children in America much like Americans. However, they may use other forms of discipline brought from the home country.
The Bible teaches the Golden Rule. Do unto others as you would have done unto you. Parents should support their children and when it becomes necessary, children should support their parents. In the Bible, the focus of the parent/child relationship was on love, honor, and respect as well as discipline and instruction (Eph. 6:1-4).
I think you should discuss how to discipline your children with your husband privately. Children will get confused if parents have different expectations.
Parental pressure is when parents either discipline or influence their children.
Psychologists support the theory that parents and caregivers use non-physical methods of disciplining their children. They state professionals should indicate to parents that physical punishment should not be used as discipline.
Because homeschooling is between the parents and the children, discipline is enforced by the parents. It is wrong to ask whether homeschooling teaches discipline, because that depends on the parents. Some parents prefer to have regimented school days, others prefer a more relaxed style of teaching and learning.
1. with love 2. with consistency
Well you really shouldn't although some parents do it for discipline. I would personally never do it but if I did I would charge $.50
Hell yeah that's what wrong with kids today parents scared to discipline them. My mother didn't spare the rod and I sure don't with my child and I'm 25
That is a matter of opinion, some people think it hurts children's self-esteem, others think it is a form of discipline. I think parents should be allowed to smack their children, enough to hurt and teach them what they are doing is wrong, but not so much as to take belts and spoons and smack their children so much that they bleed.