the link between social class and social mobility is social class ia an open system which means people are able to move up and down the social hierarchy resulting in acheiving social mobility but people may also move down the social hierarchy resulting in a lower social class this may occur if a person loses their income , wealth or status .
social mobility is when goes from one social class to another. for example a man with a working class job, is in the working class strata, but if he finds a middle class job, his strata would change.
No I don't think social class does determine a person's character because you could be vary poor but still have the best heart in the world.
because you are ugly that why
Property I think
he was in rich family. When he was a kid he inherited a fortune cause of his parents death. So I think he was in nobleman people or priests.
Everyone has different aspects from each other, but we all do share some of the same aspects like social backgrounds, gender, race and ethnicity, and social class. Those qualities are what make us more alike with each other than we all would think otherwise.
To be frank, the idea that social mobility could never happen in any case is a fallacy. Social mobility can and always does happen even where it's restricted. This is because we really cannot completely control the social interactions of people. That's not a very helpful answer to you question though. For a better answer, let's look at places where social mobility is marginal at best. Take India, for example, which has historically had poor social mobility because of its caste system. At the bottom of the caste system you have a class of people known as the untouchables. I'm no expert on sociology nor the history of India, but India has a huge wealth disparity and a lot of social problems because of its caste system. There have been repeated calls to end the caste system. When social mobility is restricted you get huge wealth disparities and socio-economic problems. You get an under-educated population and a small middle class (because the lower-classes cannot easily move into this class of people). If social mobility never happened, implying that everyone was static and their class was, say, determined at birth - I think this would merely breed conflict. Think of the aristocracy that was challenged by peasants during the French Revolution. It was called a revolution because change came of it. If change did not come of it, the violence would simply have been senseless - that's why I think it's infeasible to think of people never being socially mobile. You can take social mobility by force, if you must.
men and woman in social class learned how to socialize? think mcfly! i mean, how obvious is that! come on!
I think, Level.
it caused major separation in society, and the lack of social mobility in one's life-time.
the way we think the way we act increase durg abuse
I think it is plebeian
No I don't think social class does determine a person's character because you could be vary poor but still have the best heart in the world.
what
I think it is the Industrial Revolution
i think from my social studies class that its Spain
because you are ugly that why
People think that drug addiction is a sign of weakness or a lack of willpower. They also think that it only affects a certain class of people. There is much more to it than that and addiction affects all classes equally.