A society is better off when the standard of living for the average person is higher. When there are more chickens bred for food we as a society can eat better. When there are more high definition flat TVs produced everyone can own one and hence live a happier life. Therefore we need every citizen to contribute his share to society in order to produce more goods that raise our standard of living. In an absolutly efficient society everyone would work to produce goods so everyone can enjoy those goods that are produced in order to have a high standard of living. When people are unemployed they burden society. They use the goods that other people create but they contribute nothing themselves. This clearly is inefficient.
One good thing however is that as unemployment rises inflation falls and goods are cheaper for those people still possessing jobs. Our government tries to balance inflation and unemployment rates using both fiscal and monetary policy, but I think that is beyond the scope of your question.
Today, the possibility of losing your job looms on the horizon for many of us. Dealing with the loss of job is very similar to the emotions one feels when they experience loss through a divorce or death of a loved one. Unemployment carries an array of emotions ranging from stress, fear, anxiety, and depression. Unemployment contributes to low self-esteem and to family instability, decreased family relations, and in some cases family violence. Lessons can emerge from those who cope well with unemployment, but the immediate goal is to survive emotionally and financially until you have a clear direction for you and your family. In my research paper I will explore not just the individual directly, but the economical and psychological affects unemployment has on the family as a whole.
unemployment affects his children and his family because his family wont be able to give him the necessary things like go to school, eat 3 times a day cannot buy clothes for them or even just small toys and sometimes doesnt have any shleter. it is so hard for a child to leave in his early life like this because his parents were unemployd. they suffer emotionall physically and envying those other child that has a little in their lives.
not enough food for families
In sociology, there is a micro and macro view of communities. Micro refers to the smallest unit of a society; macro refers to the largest, or "overall" society. Unemployment will always affect the micro first; it's where people live, shop, buy services. Unemployment restricts buying power and reduces economic growth of local businesses. The more widespread unemployment becomes, the more it begins to affect a State or region, and eventually the nation.
It ended the program.
Absolutely! It will help to keep families united and protected by law, especially families where one member is a citizen and another is not, or families with young children, and elderly couples too.
Parents may not able to provide the necessity of their children.
Nowadays working women are quite helpful to the society and also to their families. Double income is better than one if you want to move forward. However the downside is that a mother being the key role in upraising the children is missing, and being replaced mostly by under qualified nannies.
I think it affect families by the actions the abuser is or was taken ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
No. Receiving SS benefits will not affect your unemployment.
The war affected American society in a few ways. An example is, many men were taken away from their families. Another example is, war makes inflation go up.
Split the families.
the anwer is NO. the unemployment rates of the U.S.A dropped slowly.
how did Linoleum affect society