What would you like to do?
What are some differences between The Call of the Wild movie and book?
No wild dogs attacking Francois and Perrault's camp No Dolly No mountain sled team that join Buck's team in catching the rabbit No Scottish half-breed No primal dreams No Skeet or Nig No fight in bar between John Thornton and Black Burton For the bet that John Thornton accepted: the money and distance were wrong and it was on mud instead of ice and snow. Buck's fight with moose was not included Quick ending No fight between Buck and wolf pack
8 people found this useful
Was this answer useful?
Thanks for the feedback!
http://www.avclub.com/articles/book-vs-film-into-the-wild,2168/ theres a whole thing comparing the two on this website
In the book, there are scenes that show Stanley at school the day he was arrested. These are not in the film, but in the deleted scenes.Stanley in the book is fat, but in the …movie, he is skinny. However, a woman who worked on the movie explained in a special feature that this was because his weight would have to change constantly since the shooting schedule was all over the place.In the book, Stanley's father wants to find a way to recycle sneakers, and he accidently created the Sploosh, but in the film, he only experiments with how to get rid of foot odor.In the film, the roles of Mr. Sir and Mr. Pendanski slightly swap: Mr. Sir is the one who saves Stanley after he digs his first hole and expresses his concern when Stanley runs away.In the film, the contents of the chest are much higher than the book.In the book, Sam and Kate kiss in the rain outside the school and are spotted by Hattie Parker as she leaves a store. In the film, they are spotted kissing in the school house by Trout as he rides by the window on his horse.In the book, Zigzag accidently hits Stanley in the back of the head with a shovel. In a deleted scene, Squid does this.In the book, Armpit is stabbed in the stomache by the Warden with her pitchfork for going to the bathroom too much. In a deleted scene, it is Magnet who is stabbed.The film more dramatically depicits the huge hole, showing a network of tunnels. The book simply says that three holes came together until it was one.In the book, Elya Yelnats is 15, but in the film, he appears to be in his late 20's or early 30's.In the book, it is said that Elya was a friend of Madame Zeroni, but this isn't stated in the movie.Mrs. Morgeno's car in the book is a BMW, but in the film, it is a Jaguar.
A few ways that the book and the movie were different is 1. In the movie whenever Rikki-tikki killed Karait in the book he went and told Chuchundra but in the movie he didn't.… 2. In the beginning of the movie, the boy was takin a bath and Rikki-tikki fell in the bathtub but in the book Rikki-tikki never fell into the bathtub. Hope this helps!!!
In the book, Stanley is really fat but in the movie he's quite thin. In the book, Kate Barlow is tortured before she dies and in the movie she dies quickly from a liz…ard bite. In the book, it describes how Stanley is tormented and bullied by kids at his school but in the movie it doesn't In the book, Squid/Alan asks Stanley to tell his mom he's sorry; in the film, Armpit/Theodore asks the favor In the book, Elya Yelnats is 15 when he falls in love with Myra Menke. In the film his age is unknown, but he appears about 25. In the book, the contents of the trunk aren't worth that much, but in the movie there are millions of dollars worth of bonds. In the film it is revealed that Mr. Pendanski is not a real counselor, but this is not mentioned in the book.
characters are older in book no giant bug in book
Well, there is a lot of differences the movie and the book. I think the book is more informing than the movie. But, since there are many differences between the movie and book…, you should just read the book.
In a movie, the producers are restricted on time, so the timeline speeds up to keep the interest of the audience. Whereas, in a book it has no time restriction, a person j…ust needs to read to learn the timeline.
The book included lots more information than the movie.
Well, some scenes were taken out, and some things from scenes in the book, were made into a different scene The book is amazing,More spectacular than the movie..There is a lot… of differences.mainly more added things to the book.Like for example rosalie was meant to be with edward that why propably she is acting jelous of Bella,Alice also has another story Where James told Bella when he attacked her.Also the relationship between edward and Bella is much more fun and intensed than the movie. Another funny thing is that mike newton,Eric and tailer asked Bella to the dance. she refused and told them she cant,but tyler said replied to her saying ok there is still the prom,Where he kept telling all the people he is gonna take Bella to the prom,Edward was jelous then and he told Bella later he was listening to the conversation and he was jelous though Bella and edward wasnt talking right then.And then at the end when Bella was in the car was edward charlie called edward to tell him that tyler is waiting at the house for Bella, he told him ok put him in, he talked to him ironically and told him she is occupied. and she is only for me. :D.....You ought to read the book its really funny and very romantic.Hope i was useful
When the dogs attack a camp, the people in the camp claim that "They were mere skeletons, draped loosely in dragged hides, with blazing eyes and slavered fangs." Describing ho…w hungry and weak the dogs were.
Is that the book is a book and a movie is a movie! is that a diffrents or not 1. The fairy god mother did not exict 2.in the book there is ect
In the book, it is clearly explained that how Canessa and Parrado find help when they reach the green valleys (they see men on the horses on the other side of river). But in t…he movie, this scene is not shown.
To truly answer this question would take more time than anyone should bother with, but I can give the overall differences: Missing from the movie was the character of Patrick… Hockstetter, as well as a few more minor characters, and the history of the monster in the town of Derry. In the movie, Beverly didn't have sex with the boys in the tunnels on their way out after they believed they killed the monster when they were 12 (early). The character of Beverly Marsh in the book was a very tough tomboyish girl who didn't take crap from anyone (except her father). In the movie, she was played by actresses who portrayed her as very meek, both in her 12 year old and adult years.The movie left out the entire part of the book when they were in the "macrospace" and mentally fighting the monster. In the movie this was simply portrayed as them being hypnotized by the monster. In the movie, the 12 year old group never made it to the "lair of it". They met up with Pennywise in the cellars in some random place.No mention of the Turtle in the movie.Many interactions with Henry were left out of the movie. There are so many more differences, but I think I hit on most of the ones that really took away important context from the movie version.
Read the book and watch the movie and you'll find out the differences...
The movie from 1953 is missing some scenes and parts from acts such as when Portia stabs herself in the thigh to prove to Brutus that she is strong enough to keep his secrets.… Another scene that was changed is when Caesar was being killed. All the conspirators ended up cutting one another along with killing Caesar but in the movie only Caesar was stabed
storm boy and fingerbone are friends from the start so it seems that it starts peacefully then gets exciting . the movie is full of action whereas in the book you can only… depend on the way its written . this is an excellent book and i hope you enjoyed it .
Everything I hated the movie it's just really creep and stupid