The factory workers may be trying to coerce above market wages or wages so high the factory cannot afford to pay them, which in a free market will result in their being replaced with new workers or force them to accept lower wages.
The supply of labor may be limited, in which case, the factory may need to relocate or close if they cannot afford to pay the higher wages.
Often, these conditions can cause the trade unionists to become upset, inciting violence against the community and factory owner.
For individual workers happy with their current pay, they may face threats or violence if they do not cooperate with the union.
To avoid these situations, the union and factory should recognize that they have a symbiotic relationship and make agreements in both their interests.
You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework and your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson. He/she doesn’t want us to answer.
i have aids
factory owners
Factory owners reacted with violence
Investment from factory owners is equity and it is shown in balance sheet of business.
Type your answer here... free factory workers were treated worse than slaves.
workers who were "Reds" or communists
Factory owners were in fact "industrialization". Because the industrial base of the North was a significant one, it allowed factory owners to buy equipment from other factories to replace worn parts and add to their factory's output.
Factory owners did not take wages, they took the profits of the factory.
During the strikes many Union workers were paid higher wages while the Factory owners got nothing in return
For the most part they were fine
to make food
Factory owners by union workers