Yes. But the suit would be for discrimination against the tenant who is handicapped, not for discrimination against the handicap. The justification for most suits for discrimination against people with handicaps is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is explained at http://www.jan.wvu.edu/links/adalinks.htm
Discrimination was like the trail of tears it was bad
No, he in fact was against Puritans.
kerela
Puritans
Anti-semitism is discrimination against Jews.
Discrimination in any form is discrimination. Individual discrimination is discrimination of one person against a group. Institutional discrimination would be a institution totally and wholly discriminating against a group or sect.
Campaign Against Racial Discrimination was created in 1964.
The Campaign Against Racial Discrimination, also known as CARD, formally ended in 1968 after achieving its goal of establishing laws against racial discrimination in the UK. The organization played a key role in influencing the passing of the Race Relations Act of 1965 and the subsequent Race Relations Act of 1968.
Religion doesn't automatically imply discrimination, though religion has been used as a reason for discrimination AND for fighting against discrimination. It all depends on the actual person, not all religious people are 'for discrimination', and not all non-religious people are against discrimination.
No. Discrimination is NEVER justified.
They were against it.
persecution
No, they were against it.
Yes. But the suit would be for discrimination against the tenant who is handicapped, not for discrimination against the handicap. The justification for most suits for discrimination against people with handicaps is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is explained at http://www.jan.wvu.edu/links/adalinks.htm
Group Against Racial Discrimination - Fiji - was created in 1990.
This is commonly referred to as institutional racism. It encompasses systematic discrimination and unequal treatment based on race within societal structures such as politics, economy, and law.