(2) Synergy in terms of management and in relation to team working refers to the combined effort of individuals as participants of the team. Positive or negative synergy can exist. The condition that exists when the organization's parts interact to produce a joint effect that is greater than the sum of the parts acting alone.
synergy refers to a financial benefit that a corporation expects to realize when it merges with or acquires another corporation. This type of synergy is a nearly ubiquitous feature of a corporate acquisition and is a negotiating point between the buyer and seller that impacts the final price both parties agree to
A synergyis where different entities cooperate advantageously for a final outcome. Simply defined, it means that the effect of the whole is greater than thesum of the effects of the individual parts. Although the whole will be greater than each individual part, this is not the concept of synergy. If used in a business application it means that teamwork will produce an overall better result than if each person was working toward the same goal individually.
they used synergy to form the group
its a dog
Synergy refers to working well together. such as.... The product created y the developement team was a big success, this is due to the apparent synergy within the team.
cinergy
Yes,Omicom did purchase Colangelo Synergy Marketing
It is the concept of synergy which is not really a mathematical concept.
Synergy.
synergy that ain't positive is termed as negative synergy...;)
financial and operating synergy
"Gung ho" and "synergy" mean the same thing: work together.
Synergy Health was created in 1991.
Synergy Health's population is 4,000.
Tri Synergy was created in 1996.
BIG Synergy was created in 1989.
they used synergy to form the group
One such concept is called synergy -when two or more companies combine they may be able to produce more profit than the sum of each individually
The concept of synergyis at the core of resource-based thinking, dating back to EdithPenrose's seminal contribution. More specifically Penrose (1959), without using the actualword though, was concerned with two forms of synergy: the possibility of sharing particu-larly managerial resources, which is brought about due to inevitable indivisibilities ofresources, and transfer of excess (and limitedly tradeable) resources. According to Porter(1987) those are the only kinds of synergy available to firms, but this paper will hopefullymake it clear that his conception is too narrow in scope.