54
Wrong actually... LIV is 54, LIX is 59.
L=50, I=1, V=5, X=10
IX = 10-1 = 9
If you mean Roman Numerals it is LIX
LIX
The Roman numerals in your question have the following numerical values...LIX = 59XLIX = 49So, LIX LIX-XLIX = 59 59-49
59 = LIX
The Roman numerals for 56, 57, 58, and 59 are: LVI, LVII, LVIII, and LIX, respectively.
If you mean Roman Numerals it is LIX
LIX
The Roman numerals in your question have the following numerical values...LIX = 59XLIX = 49So, LIX LIX-XLIX = 59 59-49
59 = LIX
The Roman numerals for 56, 57, 58, and 59 are: LVI, LVII, LVIII, and LIX, respectively.
No, 59: L=50 I=1 X=10 LIV is 54. No, these numerals are supposed to represent 59 but they should be written down as LVIIII (59) or ILX (60-1). Four IIII's is never used in Roman numerals, 59 is LIX.
LX = 60 in Roman Numerals LIX = 59
59= LIX 848= DCCCXLVIII 994 = CMXCIV
LIX, or lix.
LIX
50 to 60 in roman numerals is: 50. L 51. LI 52. LII 53. LIII 54. LIV 55. LV 56. LVI 57. LVII 58. LVIII 59. LIX 60. LX
Under today's rules governing the Roman numeral system the equivalent of 59 in Roman numerals is notated as LIX. But during the Roman era 59 was notated as LVIIII which can be simplified to ILX (60-1) in written format.