Atheism is the absence of any belief in gods. Agnosticism is a belief that it is impossible to know whether there is a God or not. Note that this is different from just 'not being sure' whether God exists or not.
Agnostics don't know (and potentially don't care) if there is a god or not. Atheists have reached a conclusion about god that indicates that there is no god, This is not "rejecting" god any more than children reject the monster under he bed as they grow older - they just realize that there is no such thing.
Atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods, while agnosticism is the belief that the existence of a god or gods is unknown or unknowable. Atheists assert that there is no evidence for the existence of a deity, whereas agnostics question whether such evidence could ever be found.
Christianity Atheism Agnosticism Scientology
Wut? Imma try to interpret this. Agnosticism doesn't have a specific god. It is just the view that their may be a creator of some sort or their may not be. It is sort of in between religion and atheism.
Dorothea Weltecke has written: '\\' -- subject(s): Atheism, Agnosticism, History
Hobbes argued for a distinction between knowledge and faith and suggested that one could not gain a knowledge of God. Thus his religion was Atheism; Agnosticism
Atheism (if you state there is no God), or Agnosticism (if you state that there is no way to know whether God exists).
MATTHEW ALUN RAY has written: 'SUBJECTIVITY AND IRRELIGION: ATHEISM AND AGNOSTICISM IN KANT, SCHOPENHAUER AND NIETZSCHE'
I believe you mean "atheism." In a nutshell, it is the belief that there is no superior being. It is often confused with agnosticism, which is when one doesn't claim or disclaim a superior being.
No one founder of agnosticism has existed. The word is a variant of agnosis, which simply means "not knowing," and people use it in reference to their belief that a person cannot truly know whether or not a god does or does not, or gods do or do not, exist. That is strong agnosticism. Weak agnosticism is an individual's being undecided.If it can be said that there was a main proponent of agnosticism, then that proponent was one of Charles Darwin's staunchest defenders, Thomas Henry Huxley. He noted that others had too-strong beliefs--he called them gnostics--whilst he was still searching. For him, agnosticism was an epistemological method, one that might have been equated with rationalism, and thus did not conflict with his being an atheist in metaphysics.Hence, it is possible for a person to be both a strong agnostic and an atheist. Rationalists declare their argumentation defensible and maintain that agnosticism applies. But some of these consider strong agnosticism wrong in that the arguments against God and the arguments for naturalism succeed. It is therefore a matter of judgment. Graham Robert Oppy, in Arguing About Gods,expresses the fallibilist attitude and explains weak agnosticism.
Anglican christianity Roman Catholic christianity Islam Judaism Hinduism Sikhism Atheism Agnosticism Hedonism
The antonym for orthodoxy is heterodoxy, which refers to beliefs or opinions that are different from established norms or standards.
Some would argue that is agnosticism or atheism. However, simply having a lack of religious belief or values makes a person a secularists in the most primary sense. Agnosticism and atheism are stated positions that come through a tremendous amount of contemplation and thinking. Atheism is a complete disavowal that any deity or god(s) exist (or at least a 99% certainty if one tends to be an empiricist). Agnostics tend toward continued debate on the issue. Short answer: Secularism.